Toby43
Structural
- Mar 9, 2017
- 114
Hoping to get others thoughts on the following...
Would you consider beam B2 in the attached sketch to torsionally/rotationally brace beam B1?
Details:
B2 is timber and fixed to main lateral system.
B1 is a steel I-beam and is part of a moment frame, hence bottom flange compression.
My take on the matter is that it will provide rotational/torsional bracing with due consideration for initial twist and bolt slip accounted for in brace forces, similar to the reasoning that slotted holes can be used to laterally brace, as long as the increased brace forces are accounted for. To look at it differently, consider if we had two independent braces coming into the beam spaced at a distance "s" apart ("s" been vert. distance between bolts), then they would create couple that provide torsional bracing.
The counter argument in my head is that using a connection detail that provides a "pin" to B2 should not be used to rotationally restrain B1.
Greatly appreciate any comments on the matter.
Regards
Toby
Would you consider beam B2 in the attached sketch to torsionally/rotationally brace beam B1?
Details:
B2 is timber and fixed to main lateral system.
B1 is a steel I-beam and is part of a moment frame, hence bottom flange compression.
My take on the matter is that it will provide rotational/torsional bracing with due consideration for initial twist and bolt slip accounted for in brace forces, similar to the reasoning that slotted holes can be used to laterally brace, as long as the increased brace forces are accounted for. To look at it differently, consider if we had two independent braces coming into the beam spaced at a distance "s" apart ("s" been vert. distance between bolts), then they would create couple that provide torsional bracing.
The counter argument in my head is that using a connection detail that provides a "pin" to B2 should not be used to rotationally restrain B1.
Greatly appreciate any comments on the matter.
Regards
Toby
