robsalv
Mechanical
- Aug 8, 2002
- 311
Folks,
We have a carbon steel distillation column/tower with cracking in the tray support ring fillet attachment welds. The service is not one where the environment promotes cracking, so the cracking appears to be related to welding technique/practice. Most cracking is on the toe of the weld on the tray ring side which we're not worrying about, but some are on the toe of the weld on the shell side.
We've been blending the shell side toe weld indications and have been finding that the cracks follows the fillet weld HAZ. One or two were followed all the way back to the tray support ring - effectively meaning we removed the weld.
These indications could be LOF or they could genuinely be cracking in the HAZ - single run fillets can have high hardnesses in the HAZ so it's not inconceivable. So far none of the crack like indications have wandered off into the parent metal of the shell.
Ther problem I have is that there are some tray ring shell side crack indiciations we can't get to as the ring is "behind" welded downcomers. I'm pretty confident that these crack like indications are exhibiting all the same signs/morphology as the cracks we've already blended out.
API 579 and our own Australian codes do not really seem to treat this particular scenario very well. These standards are more focused on cracks with some depth into the pressure retaining component.
Any thoughts on the leaving in of these hard to get to cracks???
My thoughts are: based on the finding of all other blended cracks, I'm considering them as non deleterious original manufacturing highly restrained one run fillet weld defects and providing that angle ultrasonic UT scanning from inside with a full skip confirms that no cracking veers off into the parent metal - I'll leave these hard to get to indications in. Further, I'll record the crack length and register these locations in the inspection database to ensure we have a tight repeatable and regular inspection of these specific locations.
Any thoughts on this whole scenario would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Rob
We have a carbon steel distillation column/tower with cracking in the tray support ring fillet attachment welds. The service is not one where the environment promotes cracking, so the cracking appears to be related to welding technique/practice. Most cracking is on the toe of the weld on the tray ring side which we're not worrying about, but some are on the toe of the weld on the shell side.
We've been blending the shell side toe weld indications and have been finding that the cracks follows the fillet weld HAZ. One or two were followed all the way back to the tray support ring - effectively meaning we removed the weld.
These indications could be LOF or they could genuinely be cracking in the HAZ - single run fillets can have high hardnesses in the HAZ so it's not inconceivable. So far none of the crack like indications have wandered off into the parent metal of the shell.
Ther problem I have is that there are some tray ring shell side crack indiciations we can't get to as the ring is "behind" welded downcomers. I'm pretty confident that these crack like indications are exhibiting all the same signs/morphology as the cracks we've already blended out.
API 579 and our own Australian codes do not really seem to treat this particular scenario very well. These standards are more focused on cracks with some depth into the pressure retaining component.
Any thoughts on the leaving in of these hard to get to cracks???
My thoughts are: based on the finding of all other blended cracks, I'm considering them as non deleterious original manufacturing highly restrained one run fillet weld defects and providing that angle ultrasonic UT scanning from inside with a full skip confirms that no cracking veers off into the parent metal - I'll leave these hard to get to indications in. Further, I'll record the crack length and register these locations in the inspection database to ensure we have a tight repeatable and regular inspection of these specific locations.
Any thoughts on this whole scenario would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Rob