Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Treating J anchor as rebar?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Serhiy2

Civil/Environmental
Nov 10, 2018
45
Good day,

I'm dealing with a moment frame design where I have large tensile forces at column base. Column base is anchored with 4 j anchors embedded in grade beam pilaster. I analyzed j anchor capacity using the standard CSA A23.3 procedure and the resultant tensile strength is way less than I need. The tensile strength I got is approximately 0.45 of the tensile strength of steel. My question is: can I treat j-anchor as a rebar so I would be able to use its full tensile strength as long as my embedment length equals to development length of a rebar? I would probably need to treat is as a smooth rebar and find the development length calculation approach for it but this is secondary.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Why not change to double nuts and a plate washer? Significant increase in capacity
 
Probably no:

1) plain bars lack the knurls of rebar and thus develop differentlrpy from rebar. As you noted.

2) it is critical to recognize that even if your J bolts actually were developed rebar, that alone still doesn't guarantee successful anchorage. The bar tension would either need to be passed to pier verts or react against a concrete strut.

3) Anecdotally, if it were this easy, we'd all be doing this. And we're not.
 
Agreed with all of the above. Bad idea.

Ian Riley, PE, SE
Professional Engineer (ME, NH, VT, CT, MA, FL) Structural Engineer (IL, HI)
 
jayrod12, thanks for this hint, I will try it.

KootK: agree, I would have to check development length and ensure that there is a proper load transfer mechanism down into piles.
 
I should clarify, Appendix D calcs for J-bolts have a serious reduction on capacity to account for localized crushing in the corner of the J and the straightening of the anchor bolt as failure mechanisms.

Plate washers with double nuts are considered the same as headed studs/bolts. Therefore you would use D.6.3.4 instead of D.6.3.5 for maximum capacity.

For example, a standard 19mm diameter J-bolt with a 75mm bend versus a 19mm diameter anchor rod with a 75x75 plate washer. Taking the common terms out of the equation, fc', FIEc, and R.
J-bolt = 1283
Washer= 42732

Therefore you have the potential to have a 3300% increase. The other failure modes don't have as drastic of a difference, but that was the easiest quickest one to show.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor