gscotchie
Civil/Environmental
- Dec 10, 2015
- 8
I'm encountering the message, "[80] Warning: {node} Exceeded Pond x by x.x' @ x.x hrs (x.x cfs x.x af)"
More speciffically to my model, "[80] Warning: Pond 5R Exceeded Pond 6R by 0.10' @ 12.06 hrs (2.16 cfs 0.008 af)"
Ponds 5R and 6R are Catch Basins with insignificant storage. There are two nodes (1P and 6R) feeding 5R. 5R is an 18" RCP with a slope of 1.35%. The respective flows of 1P and 6R are 4.26 and 1.42 cfs for a total flow entering the 18" RCP of 5.68 cfs. 5.68 cfs doesn't seem like enough flow to cause a reverse flow or higher tailwater in an 18" RCP with a slope of 1.35%.
How concerned do I need to be about this RED label warning.
My time increment is already 0.01 hours with the Fine Routing set to 2.
One fix I've come up with is making the slope of the existing pipe steeper. Is there anything I can do in the modeling software to not have to dig up the existing pipe only to increase the slope from 1.35% to something steeper?
Thank you
gscotchie
More speciffically to my model, "[80] Warning: Pond 5R Exceeded Pond 6R by 0.10' @ 12.06 hrs (2.16 cfs 0.008 af)"
Ponds 5R and 6R are Catch Basins with insignificant storage. There are two nodes (1P and 6R) feeding 5R. 5R is an 18" RCP with a slope of 1.35%. The respective flows of 1P and 6R are 4.26 and 1.42 cfs for a total flow entering the 18" RCP of 5.68 cfs. 5.68 cfs doesn't seem like enough flow to cause a reverse flow or higher tailwater in an 18" RCP with a slope of 1.35%.
How concerned do I need to be about this RED label warning.
My time increment is already 0.01 hours with the Fine Routing set to 2.
One fix I've come up with is making the slope of the existing pipe steeper. Is there anything I can do in the modeling software to not have to dig up the existing pipe only to increase the slope from 1.35% to something steeper?
Thank you
gscotchie