Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
Turbo Shaft Play Tolerance? 2
- Thread starter jbrehm
- Start date
yoshimitsuspeed
Automotive
The above is pretty close to what I have heard as general guidelines. It does depend on the turbo, bearings etc. If you want to get more accurate than that I would try and contact the manufacturer.
- Thread starter
- #3
patprimmer
New member
It's not necessarily quite that straight forward.
Bearing wear causes an increase in axial play.
Oil starvation is one way to accelerate bearing wear.
There is always some play otherwise no oil could flow and the shaft would seize.
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376 for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
for site rules
Bearing wear causes an increase in axial play.
Oil starvation is one way to accelerate bearing wear.
There is always some play otherwise no oil could flow and the shaft would seize.
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376 for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
for site rules
-
1
- #5
turbomotor
Mechanical
jbrehm,
Depends on the size of the turbo, the size of the bearings and shaft, and type of bearings (full floating hydrodynamic or rolling element).
A turbo for a (relatively) large CAT 3612 may have greater axial and radial play specs that a turbo for an 800cc smart car diesel.
For typical hydrodynamic journal and thrust bearing systems, and assuming that you are thinking typical pass car engine size, I would guess 0.001 to 0.003 axial play is OK (units are inches), and 0.001 to 0.004 radial play is OK. True radial play is difficult to measure without the correct probe. Accurate radial play should be measured as shaft excursion between the bearings when manually displacing both the compressor and turbine ends of the rotating group in the same direction.
Dick
Depends on the size of the turbo, the size of the bearings and shaft, and type of bearings (full floating hydrodynamic or rolling element).
A turbo for a (relatively) large CAT 3612 may have greater axial and radial play specs that a turbo for an 800cc smart car diesel.
For typical hydrodynamic journal and thrust bearing systems, and assuming that you are thinking typical pass car engine size, I would guess 0.001 to 0.003 axial play is OK (units are inches), and 0.001 to 0.004 radial play is OK. True radial play is difficult to measure without the correct probe. Accurate radial play should be measured as shaft excursion between the bearings when manually displacing both the compressor and turbine ends of the rotating group in the same direction.
Dick
-
1
- #6
Axial tolerance can never be zero, because there absolutely must be allowance for thermal expansion.
As Dick says, the type and size of turbo will change things greatly.
Anecdotal evidence is all you are likely to get on an internet Forum.
Best to contact the manufacturer of the specific turbo for some hard numbers.
As Dick says, the type and size of turbo will change things greatly.
Anecdotal evidence is all you are likely to get on an internet Forum.
Best to contact the manufacturer of the specific turbo for some hard numbers.
"Can oil starvation cause shaft play?"
I'd say on a sleeve bearing turbo, oil starvation for any length of time at all would likely cause catastrophic bearing failure.
I'd say on a sleeve bearing turbo, oil starvation for any length of time at all would likely cause catastrophic bearing failure.
"Axial tolerance can never be zero, because there absolutely must be allowance for thermal expansion"
Agree it can't be zero - the oil film has to fit somewhere. It is possible to design a thrust bearing to maintain constant clearance under varying temperatures.
Engineering is the art of creating things you need, from things you can get.
Agree it can't be zero - the oil film has to fit somewhere. It is possible to design a thrust bearing to maintain constant clearance under varying temperatures.
Engineering is the art of creating things you need, from things you can get.
Yes, but the original poster referred specifically to "modern" turbos, which to me implies ball bearings.
Those don't have a single dedicated thrust bearing, but use the angular contact ball races at each end of the housing to locate the shaft.
Shaft expansion will tend to close up any end float, as the shaft usually runs hotter than the housing.
Sleeve bearing turbos are a whole different ball game.
Those don't have a single dedicated thrust bearing, but use the angular contact ball races at each end of the housing to locate the shaft.
Shaft expansion will tend to close up any end float, as the shaft usually runs hotter than the housing.
Sleeve bearing turbos are a whole different ball game.
turbomotor,
I recall many years ago a case of incorrect axial preload on a ball bearing center section re-designed by a mutual acquaintance of ours (RH). It was for the Nissan '90 GTP race car.
The spool had excessive axial play. Every time the driver shifted or got off the throttle, the change in pressure force between the compressor and turbine would cause the spool to momentarily shift axially and upset the piston ring seal. A small amount of oil would leak into the turbine housing and create a big puff of exhaust smoke.
Regards,
Terry
I recall many years ago a case of incorrect axial preload on a ball bearing center section re-designed by a mutual acquaintance of ours (RH). It was for the Nissan '90 GTP race car.
The spool had excessive axial play. Every time the driver shifted or got off the throttle, the change in pressure force between the compressor and turbine would cause the spool to momentarily shift axially and upset the piston ring seal. A small amount of oil would leak into the turbine housing and create a big puff of exhaust smoke.
Regards,
Terry
- Status
Similar threads
