Bay_ENG
Structural
- Aug 12, 2020
- 4
Hey all,
I was hoping someone could help me understand how live load distribution (LLDF) factors are applied. The wording in the AASHTO specifications isn't clear and I haven't been able to find any helpful resources online.
My question is: When determining the resultant moment (or shear) in a single girder, do you multiply the LLDF by the max. moment due to a single lane of loading or the max. moment due to the multiple lanes of loading.
i.e. Assume the maximum positive moment due to single lane loading is 100K-ft and that the LLDF is given as g where n is the number of lanes being loaded.
Assuming 1 lane loading, the resultant moment that a single girder experiences is given as Mg = 100K-ft*g(1)
Now, which of the two options below would be correct for two lane loading:
Mg = 200K-ft*g(2)
Mg = 100K-ft*g(2)
I've spoken with two other engineers and they've given conflicting answers. On one hand it intuitively makes sense that the total moment should be multiplied by the LLDF (200K-ft), but it also doesn't make sense given that the LLDF, g, is given in "lanes".
I was hoping someone could help me understand how live load distribution (LLDF) factors are applied. The wording in the AASHTO specifications isn't clear and I haven't been able to find any helpful resources online.
My question is: When determining the resultant moment (or shear) in a single girder, do you multiply the LLDF by the max. moment due to a single lane of loading or the max. moment due to the multiple lanes of loading.
i.e. Assume the maximum positive moment due to single lane loading is 100K-ft and that the LLDF is given as g where n is the number of lanes being loaded.
Assuming 1 lane loading, the resultant moment that a single girder experiences is given as Mg = 100K-ft*g(1)
Now, which of the two options below would be correct for two lane loading:
Mg = 200K-ft*g(2)
Mg = 100K-ft*g(2)
I've spoken with two other engineers and they've given conflicting answers. On one hand it intuitively makes sense that the total moment should be multiplied by the LLDF (200K-ft), but it also doesn't make sense given that the LLDF, g, is given in "lanes".