gcs3pe
Structural
- Dec 3, 2010
- 22
Stop me if you've heard this before (but I'll need a picture to believe you). I'm reviewing the roof framing for a client with a 48' deep center hall colonial. The 10/12 pitch is formed with 11.88" LVL rafters at 16" on center, and they're tied at the top of the outside wall with continuous, 48' 11.88" LVL ceiling joists running parallel to the rafters. Halfway up into this cavernous space (10') there is an attic ceiling joist framed with (you guessed it) 11.88" LVLs. All connections are made with 4ea 1/2" bolts, except for the rafter tops, which are strapped to a non-structural 16" LVL ridge board (and each other).
Question: has anyone had any luck convincing a code official that an attic itself cannot have an attic? He wants me to apply significant live loading to the top of the attic ceiling joists because (let's face it) there's 10' of headroom up there.
Since the system appears to work without the ceiling joists (members, connections good), should I have the attic ceiling LVLs removed? Because the way I see it, those forces could (on paper) exceed the moment capacity of the rafters.
It seems a bit counterintuitive. Of course, as always, I may have missed something in my hastily drawn FBDs.
Question: has anyone had any luck convincing a code official that an attic itself cannot have an attic? He wants me to apply significant live loading to the top of the attic ceiling joists because (let's face it) there's 10' of headroom up there.
Since the system appears to work without the ceiling joists (members, connections good), should I have the attic ceiling LVLs removed? Because the way I see it, those forces could (on paper) exceed the moment capacity of the rafters.
It seems a bit counterintuitive. Of course, as always, I may have missed something in my hastily drawn FBDs.