schaplan
Aerospace
- Sep 19, 2013
- 8
We have a rotational scanner which uses a v-belt drive (2L size v-belt, 0.25in wide), and we're getting slippage on the drive sheave. The current design is at maximum tension, although we can modify the design to increase the tension on the belt. Before modifying the geometry of the tension system (bearing slides perpendicular to belt on one side between sheaves), I'd like to get some feedback on materials or other solutions.
The drive sheave diameter is 3in and the driven sheave is 9in, and we used the Gates design manual to spec the grooves.
The driven sheave (9in) requires 18 lb-ft to move at 21rpm (max speed).
Both sheaves are sealed anodized aluminum, and the belt (34in long) is rubber with polyester reinforcing cords. We understand we can increase the traction of the drive sheave by separating the pulleys more (as suggested by Gates) but this also isn't an option in the short term, and if we move the drive pulley it has to go on another platform where the belt will need to be 75-80in and I haven't seen 2L belts that length.
Is the anodized aluminum a poor sheave material? Can I improve the traction with another material?
The drive sheave diameter is 3in and the driven sheave is 9in, and we used the Gates design manual to spec the grooves.
The driven sheave (9in) requires 18 lb-ft to move at 21rpm (max speed).
Both sheaves are sealed anodized aluminum, and the belt (34in long) is rubber with polyester reinforcing cords. We understand we can increase the traction of the drive sheave by separating the pulleys more (as suggested by Gates) but this also isn't an option in the short term, and if we move the drive pulley it has to go on another platform where the belt will need to be 75-80in and I haven't seen 2L belts that length.
Is the anodized aluminum a poor sheave material? Can I improve the traction with another material?