Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Vacuum Issues

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rat1

Mechanical
May 4, 2006
5
US
Anyone have experience with a vessel (ca 1980) that has a U-1 indicating full vacuum not even being close under the current code? Still has original thickness, looks good, and is sufficiently thick for the pressure rating. BUT, the vacuum is the issue. Evaluating to origianl code is not an option.

Any thoughts??
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I don't think the Code has changed in this time regarding vacuum design so it would appear that it was never good for full vacuum in the first instance. Where does it now fail?
 
Maximum external pressure is ~9.5 psi.

Most likely they do not ever run much vacuum.

Thanks for the input.
 
Rat-

My guess is that your vessel was designed for half vacuum. Prior to 1998 (or perhaps the '96 or '97 Addenda) VIII-1 UG-28(f) stated that vessels ...shall be designed for a maximum allowable external working pressure of 15 psi or 25% more than the maximum possible external pressure, whichever is smaller. I designed many vessels to half vac using an external design pressure of 9.375 (that's 1.25*7.5). Somewhere along the way to the U1 form the "half vac" got changed to "full vac."

jt
 
We see many vessels with rings for vacuum support. I think the "code" reqirement is a gray area because it is under the +/-15 psi cutoff. We review the vessel based on the operating conditions, and if the calcs. say X vacuum is acceptable, that is what we allow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top