Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Vacuum Rings vs. Wall Thickness

Status
Not open for further replies.

Otis4949

Mechanical
Nov 16, 2016
2
Is there a quick reference for determining additional wall thickness, in lieu of vacuums rings for a FV vessel? Example below:

24" ID x 6' S/S - MAWP 250 - Full Vacuum - 516-70. Calcs give me .277" wall thickness with 3 rings. If I bumped the thickness to 0.5" would that suffice for the external pressure from the FV?

Thanks

OtisWasYellow
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Run the calculations and see for yourself.

Nobody can provide you with a rule of thumb if you don't provide such crucial/critical information as the Code of Construction or the coincident temperature.
 
Well thanks TGS4 - I am on the road and don't have access to compress therefore I can't run the calcs at the moment. Yes I was looking for a rule of thumb, however, you so aptly pointed out that there isn't one.

ASME Section VIII - Div 1
24" ID x 6' S/S - Vertical
MAWP 250
-20/200F
CA 0.125"
Full Vacuum
516-70

Calcs give me .277" wall thickness with 3 rings. If I bumped the thickness to 0.5" would that suffice for the external pressure from the FV?


OtisWasYellow
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor