Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

VALVES FIRE SAFE STANDARDS

Status
Not open for further replies.

BFZHA

Mechanical
Oct 29, 2009
33
Hi;
I'm working on ball valves specifications and Our client spicify the following standards for fire tests ISO 10497 / API 607 and API 6FA.
I have just checked this standards and I found the qualifications of valves by nominal size aren't the same between ISO 10497 / API 607 and API 6FA;
- in ISO 10497 / API 607 all valves NPS>12" will be qualified by valve NPS 8,
- API 6FA valves the qualification is more détailed, for example valve NPS 42" will be qualified by valve NPS 16 (Table 2 API 6FA)while for the two first standards the same valve will be qualified by valve NPS 8.
It's obvious that the test cost isn't the same according to each standards. API 6FA seem to be more strenght.
My question is:
- Can we specify this standards as Identical or shall we specify one of them?
- And if tehre is what is a difference between them?
Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Per it's scope, API 6FA is a test intended for API 6A and API 6D valves. The scope of API 607 does not restrict the document to any particular valve standard. However, there is nothing in particular about either standard that would preclude its use with any valve per se.

In general, API 607 is normally assumed to be a more stringent fire test (although I have not reviewed the lastest edition in detail so perhaps this has changed) and most end users that I am familiar with would specify the API 607 test and would not accept an API 6FA test in place of the API 607 test.

However, most of these folks accept a API 607 test in place of the API 6FA test. Ultimately, you would have to consult with the end user and determine what their specifications say and what they will accept.

I don't remember the difference between the tests (I think it had to do with the fluid in the valve during test, how the valve is cooled after the test, and whether the valve is cycled after the test before being checked for leakage. It would be a simple matter to compare the two documents side by side.
 
I have to agree with rneill's comments above. I would add that API 607 is specifically for soft seated, quarter turn whist API 6FA is a general valve fire safe test. Therefore I would analyse what you looking for, if you are buying soft seated ball valves then I would specify API 607 as it is the most applicable. I would also agree, having tested to both standards, that it is the more demanding test. I would not get hung up on the size issue. The whole point of the test, it seems to me, is to prove that with the valve closed whatever is upstream of the valve will not significantly add to the fuel for the fire, either through the valve body joints/seals or across the valve seats, whilst the site is being evacuated or initial attempts to extinguish the fire are made. I would not be expecting much more from any valve.
 
I will note that older editions of the API 607 Std were titled "Fire Test for Soft Seated Quarter Turn Valves". However, the current edition is titled "Test of Valves - Fire Type Testing Requirements".

The change in title suggests that it is no longer intended that this standard be restricted to soft seated valves and that it could more generally be used for any valve. Since there is nothing in the scope to restrict it in any way, I think this is an appropriate interpretation.
 
When ISO adopted API-607 to create ISO-10497, note that the title and scope changed and it is not limited to soft-seated quarter-turn valves. The title of ISO-10497 is, "Testing of valves - Fire type-testing requirements". So the ISO version applies to all valves.

Also it is important to note that the API-600 series standards for gate, globe, check, ball and butterflys used in Refineries all require API-607. And since ISO adopted API-607 to create their version, they are the same for all intents and purposes. Minor differences, but the end results are the same.

API-6D, for upstream pipeline valve, not for refinery valves, allows several diffrent options for fire-testing. 6FA, 607, and ISO 10497. So your best bet to cover all options is to specify API-607 / ISO-10497 for all valves. It is accepted for any valve from the refinery back to the well head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor