BFZHA
Mechanical
- Oct 29, 2009
- 33
Hi;
I'm working on ball valves specifications and Our client spicify the following standards for fire tests ISO 10497 / API 607 and API 6FA.
I have just checked this standards and I found the qualifications of valves by nominal size aren't the same between ISO 10497 / API 607 and API 6FA;
- in ISO 10497 / API 607 all valves NPS>12" will be qualified by valve NPS 8,
- API 6FA valves the qualification is more détailed, for example valve NPS 42" will be qualified by valve NPS 16 (Table 2 API 6FA)while for the two first standards the same valve will be qualified by valve NPS 8.
It's obvious that the test cost isn't the same according to each standards. API 6FA seem to be more strenght.
My question is:
- Can we specify this standards as Identical or shall we specify one of them?
- And if tehre is what is a difference between them?
Thanks
I'm working on ball valves specifications and Our client spicify the following standards for fire tests ISO 10497 / API 607 and API 6FA.
I have just checked this standards and I found the qualifications of valves by nominal size aren't the same between ISO 10497 / API 607 and API 6FA;
- in ISO 10497 / API 607 all valves NPS>12" will be qualified by valve NPS 8,
- API 6FA valves the qualification is more détailed, for example valve NPS 42" will be qualified by valve NPS 16 (Table 2 API 6FA)while for the two first standards the same valve will be qualified by valve NPS 8.
It's obvious that the test cost isn't the same according to each standards. API 6FA seem to be more strenght.
My question is:
- Can we specify this standards as Identical or shall we specify one of them?
- And if tehre is what is a difference between them?
Thanks