Sawsan311
Chemical
- Jun 21, 2019
- 303
Dear All,
I am investigation control schemes for parallel injection pumps application, typically the injection flow rates are set at the individual wellhead chokes and system is required to achieve a target wellhead pressure.
I would like to get your technical views on the robustness of the following option for a variable speed motor (VFD) control:
A- setting the primary controlled variable as the flow rate with a required design contingency to ensure that in case one pump trips, the controller will not force the pumps to speed up beyond their run out conditions.
B- Pressure control at the common discharge header to maintain the network pressure at a target corresponding to the wellhead pressure. In case of high backpressure, the pumps will tend to slow down to maintain the set point.
From energy optimization perspectives, the throttling losses across the individual wellhead choke valves are not wasted as in the case of flow control. Additionally, the same injection flow rate can be managed under various target operating pressure and it will not be required for operator to continuously adjust the injection rates for the pump control.
On the other hand, if a fixed speed design is adapted with individual discharge throttling, in case of flat pump curve, operating the discharge valve as PCV will jeopardize the performance of the pump with respect to the risk of operating towards the left end of the curve. While the same concern is not envisaged in the case of a discharge FCV.
Do you agree that the pump curve shape is a determining factor for a throttling control scheme since the action of the valve modifies the system curve. While the pump curve shape will not be endangered in case of a variable speed control under pressure?? since system curve in this case is not being modified by a discharge throttling action?
Appreciate your views.
Thanks
Regards,
I am investigation control schemes for parallel injection pumps application, typically the injection flow rates are set at the individual wellhead chokes and system is required to achieve a target wellhead pressure.
I would like to get your technical views on the robustness of the following option for a variable speed motor (VFD) control:
A- setting the primary controlled variable as the flow rate with a required design contingency to ensure that in case one pump trips, the controller will not force the pumps to speed up beyond their run out conditions.
B- Pressure control at the common discharge header to maintain the network pressure at a target corresponding to the wellhead pressure. In case of high backpressure, the pumps will tend to slow down to maintain the set point.
From energy optimization perspectives, the throttling losses across the individual wellhead choke valves are not wasted as in the case of flow control. Additionally, the same injection flow rate can be managed under various target operating pressure and it will not be required for operator to continuously adjust the injection rates for the pump control.
On the other hand, if a fixed speed design is adapted with individual discharge throttling, in case of flat pump curve, operating the discharge valve as PCV will jeopardize the performance of the pump with respect to the risk of operating towards the left end of the curve. While the same concern is not envisaged in the case of a discharge FCV.
Do you agree that the pump curve shape is a determining factor for a throttling control scheme since the action of the valve modifies the system curve. While the pump curve shape will not be endangered in case of a variable speed control under pressure?? since system curve in this case is not being modified by a discharge throttling action?
Appreciate your views.
Thanks
Regards,