lmarcantonio
Electrical
- Dec 10, 2024
- 4
At the moment we are running with standard induction motors, however we choose the VFD (Hitachi WJ-C1) since the vendor/FAE said "it will works with PM motors too" and we wanted to keep the option for that. However (in the small writing of the spec) they actually say
My theories:
Of course, we are hoisting and the vendor fully knew that. Now, before trying and having things falling around, do you ever had such a statement? Motor vendor said that installing a PG should make it work (the C1 has the input so it's doable) but I'm wondering about why and the consequences (the VFD vendor is useless, he says "it works anyway")."The permanent magnet motor control function is only suitable for variable torque applications such as fan and pump. When using sensorless vector control for permanent magnet motor (PM), please contact your dealer."
My theories:
- in constant torque an overload would cause a slow down (i.e. loss of synchronous speed, due to no slip allowance) with catastrophic load consequences; a PG would probably allow the VFD to at least get the field in sync. Wouldn't sensorless get it however? maybe at low speed even PM motors have tracking issues?
- maybe the control algorithm doesn't support field weakening? shouldn't matter since it's an issue for quadratic loads too and it only matters at high speeds; if I drive a motor at its rated frequency it shouldn't be an issue