Simba13
Structural
- May 19, 2020
- 103
Just kind of a general inquiry here. I'm trying to get people's thoughts on taking the SE exam. Very typical post I know, but I have a couple specific things I'm curious about. I just took and passed the PE and I'm in no rush to get back to studying. But I feel like I use so much software at work that I wouldn't mind eventually buckling down and really studying hand-calcs/codes etc, that's really the stuff I enjoy more about our profession in the first place.
But hear me out, is it just me, or is the value proposition of taking the SE in a non-SE state kind of strange? I studied for about 200 hours for the PE, and I expect I'll get a decent pay bump when I finish my 4 years and actually get my license. But what do you actually get professionally for getting the SE after that point, a test for which I'll need to study about 400 hours (probably more, I'm not the greatest test taker)? I feel like my firm pushes it a fair amount, and I see the EITs burning themselves out trying to not only study but keep up with their workloads at the same time.
I know it's a learning thing, and a respect thing, and just kind of a general gold star on your resume but does anyone working in the industry feel like the PE is just fine or have they felt held back by not getting the SE? I'm also curious about your thoughts on which states will eventually go SE, is it just inevitable that they all go SE eventually? I'm in Virginia, so I'm especially interested in what people like phamENG and Hokie think here as we're in the same neck of the woods. I feel like we're kind of in the middle of the distribution as far as this goes, not a hyper bureaucracy pro state, but then there's Northern Virginia... nuff said. Do you think we go SE in the next 20 years?
I'm not one of those boo-hooers on structural engineering, and like I said I actually wouldn't mind studying some of this stuff (after a while). But at the end of the day it is primarily just a job and some kind of cost-benefit analysis is warranted when you're talking about sacrificing 6 months of your life and potentially thousands of dollars (my firm only covers the first try) on test registration, a course, books etc especially when the pass rate is so low. I work with a lot of overachievers which I actually love btw but I almost feel guilty when I think the PE is just fine while I see them banging their heads against the SE. Am I alone here? What do you all think? Is there any additional benefit where you work for the SE over the PE? And if so, is it worth it? I bet the people that have passed it say it's worth it now that it's over, but what about the people that have taken it a few times and haven't passed...
Very curious on your thoughts with this. Thanks!
But hear me out, is it just me, or is the value proposition of taking the SE in a non-SE state kind of strange? I studied for about 200 hours for the PE, and I expect I'll get a decent pay bump when I finish my 4 years and actually get my license. But what do you actually get professionally for getting the SE after that point, a test for which I'll need to study about 400 hours (probably more, I'm not the greatest test taker)? I feel like my firm pushes it a fair amount, and I see the EITs burning themselves out trying to not only study but keep up with their workloads at the same time.
I know it's a learning thing, and a respect thing, and just kind of a general gold star on your resume but does anyone working in the industry feel like the PE is just fine or have they felt held back by not getting the SE? I'm also curious about your thoughts on which states will eventually go SE, is it just inevitable that they all go SE eventually? I'm in Virginia, so I'm especially interested in what people like phamENG and Hokie think here as we're in the same neck of the woods. I feel like we're kind of in the middle of the distribution as far as this goes, not a hyper bureaucracy pro state, but then there's Northern Virginia... nuff said. Do you think we go SE in the next 20 years?
I'm not one of those boo-hooers on structural engineering, and like I said I actually wouldn't mind studying some of this stuff (after a while). But at the end of the day it is primarily just a job and some kind of cost-benefit analysis is warranted when you're talking about sacrificing 6 months of your life and potentially thousands of dollars (my firm only covers the first try) on test registration, a course, books etc especially when the pass rate is so low. I work with a lot of overachievers which I actually love btw but I almost feel guilty when I think the PE is just fine while I see them banging their heads against the SE. Am I alone here? What do you all think? Is there any additional benefit where you work for the SE over the PE? And if so, is it worth it? I bet the people that have passed it say it's worth it now that it's over, but what about the people that have taken it a few times and haven't passed...
Very curious on your thoughts with this. Thanks!