Ajaxtheminor
Petroleum
- Aug 22, 2014
- 4
Currently we are designing tie-in points for a boiler house in a Kraft mill, the pipe runs (headers) we are teeing into range from 40NB (1-1/2”) to 200NB (8”), the contents range from black liquor, steam, condensate, potable water and pulp.
Company policy is to use ASME B31.1 which we have done, the tie-ins encapsulate a double block and bleed (DBB).
The conundrum is we will not be hydro testing the DBB tie in points in their entirety, isolation will be form the first block valve off the main run (header) therefore hydro will only be of the new lines.
I can’t seem to find anything in ASME B31.1 that suggests other forms of testing the DBB system for quality assurance and compliance with the code i.e. increased non-destructive testing (NDT) in lieu of hydro test, like radiography (RT), Ultrasonic testing can’t be used because thickness is too thin.
We have a solution in that the engineering design will specify extra NDT in the form of RT to compensate for the fact that we aren’t hydro testing the DBB system in full.
Have I missed something in ASME B31.1 about this situation?
Company policy is to use ASME B31.1 which we have done, the tie-ins encapsulate a double block and bleed (DBB).
The conundrum is we will not be hydro testing the DBB tie in points in their entirety, isolation will be form the first block valve off the main run (header) therefore hydro will only be of the new lines.
I can’t seem to find anything in ASME B31.1 that suggests other forms of testing the DBB system for quality assurance and compliance with the code i.e. increased non-destructive testing (NDT) in lieu of hydro test, like radiography (RT), Ultrasonic testing can’t be used because thickness is too thin.
We have a solution in that the engineering design will specify extra NDT in the form of RT to compensate for the fact that we aren’t hydro testing the DBB system in full.
Have I missed something in ASME B31.1 about this situation?