The possible incongruity of "million" aside, "milli" means thousand, or thousandth.
BTW, where I work, when I refer to a "mill" instead of "a thousandth (of an inch)", people look at me as if I have two heads. This might be a peculiar "linguistic island", but my point is that mil is not universal.
I have seen this unit expressed several times and I wish it was not used! I practice in an area where imperial units and metric units are used. A MIL has been used to express 'a thousandth of an inch' in imperial measure. I have seen 'MIL' specified for products, etc. (e.g. poly vapor barier) on projects designed by and large using metric units. Further, MIL is an acronym for other units of measure including angular measure (i.e. 1/6400 of a revolution) and volume measure (i.e. 1/1000 of a litre).
There are 2 pi radians or 6.28 radians in a circle or 6,280 thousands of a radian in a circle. The army rounded it up to 6,400.
The reason I remember for using mils was clarity and speed in communications. Instead or telling someone to elevate their field pice 46 degrees-34 minutes you could say 827
mills. Another one of those things where close is good enough ( like horse shoes, hand gernades and atom bombs)
Torch, be careful when new people come in. I think most US engineers and machinists would assume you meant "50 thou" if you said "50 mils"
A lot has been said about mil, thou, inches and millimeters here. But do you know how the relation 1 inch = 25,4 mm came about?
It is one of the first de facto standards that later was accepted as an official standard. Here is how and why:
Henry Ford needed accurate measurements and also standardised measurements in his mass fabrication of motor and other car parts. If he didn't have a standardised measure in all his factories, then the pieces wouldn't fit. Actually, mass production could not exist without standardised measures. So Henry Ford asked the Swedish inventor Carl Edward Johansson to deliver end-gauges (aka Joe-blocks) to Fords factories. Johansson was willing, but there was no fixed relation between inches and millimeters - the NBS was working on it and the Congress also had a say in this matter.
The Congress could not decide - there were a lot of different inches around and each congressman thougt that "his" inch was just right and all the others were more or less wrong, so there was no deciscion in the Congress - and no official relation between the inch and the millimeter in the NBS.
This went on for years, and Henry Ford got more and more irritated. At least he told Carl Edward Johansson to make the end-gauges to a convenient and rational measure and CEJ chose 25,4 mm to an inch and delivered the blocks. And ever after that an inch equals 25,4 mm.
CEJ had a reason to chose 25,4; it allowed to switch from metric to imperial threads in a lathe by using two wheels with 100 and 127 cogs on them. 25,0 mm had been too far off what was used in most states, but 25,4 was close enough to the majority of inches.
Thanks Binary.
I'll be careful if I'm ever in the US.
I live in New Zealand - ex South Africa. Both countries are pre-dominantly metric. (I say pre-dominantly because the old "obsolete" imperial system of measurement does still creep in in some areas.)
The abbreviation "mils" for millimeters is commonly used in both countries.
There is a conflict with what I know.
According to the document titled "The Edison of Sweden : C.E. Johansson and the 'Standards of Standard'" written by Goeran Ahlstroem, C.E> Johansson contacted Henry Ford by letter, offering his collaboration.
Ref:
I am very much interested in Johansson's contribution in metrology.
Could you please let me know the reference where I can get more information on "inch-mm conversion history"? The thread of yours is the only information on inch-mm conversion history I have.