In cases like this, where there's a gray area in the code, I typically use the most conservative interpretation, meaning that which results in the greatest loading on the structure. Now, based on your sketch, I would expect the wind loading on this particular geometry to be very close to that of a rectangle. If the indent was greater, then I would expect that to be less the case.
My general approach for wind loading on irregular structures is:
[ol 1]
[li]Use a very conservative wind load. In my case, that might mean 30 psf or 35 psf. If using this load doesn't result in a structure outside the norm, then there's no need to refine the loading further. This might be the case for a building with minimal exterior openings and/or in a geographic location with a lower design wind speed.[/li]
[li]If the more conservative loads are problematic, then use a more refined analysis. I'm guessing that you're using ASCE 7, Chapter 28 (Envelope Procedure) which is a simplified method. Using the Directional Procedure of Chapter 27 is more geared towards irregular structures. There's a publication title "Guide to the Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7-16" which is really helpful. It includes several examples with irregular shaped structures.[/li]
[/ol]