Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

WInd Loads for h < 60 ft

Status
Not open for further replies.

Murali27

Structural
Sep 28, 2002
147
Dear everyone,

I have a building right now with L = 45', B = 30' & H = 55 ft.

Can i use the procedure stated in asce 7 for h < 60ft?.
Am i missing something.....

If the structure is flexible (where h<60 ft), how to include gust factor.

Thanks for your info on this.


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Your eave height exceeds the least horizontal dimension so you do not qualify for the low-rise provisions (definition in 6.2). That means you fall under either 6.5.12.2.1 or 6.5.12.2.3 (not 6.5.12.2.2). You are permitted to use the normal wind provisions, rather than the low-rise provisions, at any time but not vice versa. References are to ASCE7-02.
 
Thanks ajh1

If i am right, say this is applicable only in the direction
perpendicular to the least lateral dimension (which is less than eave's height). i.e

B = 30 ft, L = 80 ft & H = 55 ft.

In the direction perpendicular to "L" = 6.5.12.2.1 or 6.5.12.2.3

In the direction perpendicular to "B" = 6.5.12.2.2 or 6.5.12.2.3

The class 6.5.12.2.3 to be used irrespective of eave
height only if structure is flexible.

Thanks in advance

 
The definition does not distinguish between dimension parallel to wind and dimension perpendicular to wind, it simply says least horizontal dimension. Realistically I doubt there is that much difference in actual loads between 6.5.12.2.1 and 6.5.12.2.2. I would probably use 6.5.12.2.1 for both directions regardless of the applicability of 6.5.12.2.2. Simpler, easier for the code guy to follow, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor