Wfg42438
Electrical
- Apr 10, 2017
- 67
Hello Everyone,
I was reading this article on generator decrement curves created by cummins and its was quite interesting.
On Figure 3 of the article, they show that in there example for a terminal fault at around 0.1 seconds both the line to line and L-G fault currents are larger than the 3Ph fault current.
I have seen articles on the L-G being largest but was surprised to see the LL current also being larger than the 3Ph current.
I wanted to ask in practice how is this accounted for and how common is this case?
I am thinking in practice your limiting factor is the LG fault current since the generator will have a maximum time it can sustain for under a LG fault which for the example in the article is much smaller than for the LL case.
Is the idea to simply use protection that operates prior to the time where this phenomenon occurs?
if anyone can shed some light on this it be much appreciated.
I was reading this article on generator decrement curves created by cummins and its was quite interesting.
On Figure 3 of the article, they show that in there example for a terminal fault at around 0.1 seconds both the line to line and L-G fault currents are larger than the 3Ph fault current.
I have seen articles on the L-G being largest but was surprised to see the LL current also being larger than the 3Ph current.
I wanted to ask in practice how is this accounted for and how common is this case?
I am thinking in practice your limiting factor is the LG fault current since the generator will have a maximum time it can sustain for under a LG fault which for the example in the article is much smaller than for the LL case.
Is the idea to simply use protection that operates prior to the time where this phenomenon occurs?
if anyone can shed some light on this it be much appreciated.
Last edited: