Lampropeltis
Mechanical
- Nov 11, 2011
- 7
I would like an opinion (or better) on whether or not 516-70n (normalized) is a suitable material replacement for API5LX70 (X70) for construction of a pressure vessel - giving consideration to modulus, ksi, etc of both materials (I believe they are similar enough).
vessel design criteria is as follows: 36" OD x 40'long @1500 psi @120*F no corrosion allowance.
I just cant find enough good data on the 516-70n to justify the substitution.
The 516-70 would be purchased in plate form, then rolled and welded, whereas the x70 would be purchased as pipe from the mill and have heads or endcaps welded.
Thanks for any help or suggestions that can be offered. And just FYI - the reason for the switch is material lead time. the x70 takes a lot longer to acquire than the 516-70. If anyone has any other material suggestions, they are gladly welcome.
vessel design criteria is as follows: 36" OD x 40'long @1500 psi @120*F no corrosion allowance.
I just cant find enough good data on the 516-70n to justify the substitution.
The 516-70 would be purchased in plate form, then rolled and welded, whereas the x70 would be purchased as pipe from the mill and have heads or endcaps welded.
Thanks for any help or suggestions that can be offered. And just FYI - the reason for the switch is material lead time. the x70 takes a lot longer to acquire than the 516-70. If anyone has any other material suggestions, they are gladly welcome.