LONDONDERRY
Mechanical
- Dec 20, 2005
- 124
Greeting-
So I'm having this heated debate with a fellow engineer on the following issue.
In a cases where dowel pins, threaded inserts or other parts are permanently attached I call them out on a detail drawing (except a weldment). For example, a sheet metal drawing that has PEMS (threaded inserts) pressed in can be called out on a detail drawing instead of creating another layer of documentation the same for a block with a pin pressed in. I've ben doing this way for 25 years without an issues.
However this engineer tells me thats wrong, and a assembly drawing need to be created that calls out the machined part and the pin. I find it unnecessary to create this extra lay of documentation.
So the question is who's right and who's wrong and is there a drafting standard for this? Maybe this is an issue where its neither right or wrong and its a preference on how to create documentaton. Isn't this type of drawing called and inseperable assembly drawing?
Frank
So I'm having this heated debate with a fellow engineer on the following issue.
In a cases where dowel pins, threaded inserts or other parts are permanently attached I call them out on a detail drawing (except a weldment). For example, a sheet metal drawing that has PEMS (threaded inserts) pressed in can be called out on a detail drawing instead of creating another layer of documentation the same for a block with a pin pressed in. I've ben doing this way for 25 years without an issues.
However this engineer tells me thats wrong, and a assembly drawing need to be created that calls out the machined part and the pin. I find it unnecessary to create this extra lay of documentation.
So the question is who's right and who's wrong and is there a drafting standard for this? Maybe this is an issue where its neither right or wrong and its a preference on how to create documentaton. Isn't this type of drawing called and inseperable assembly drawing?
Frank