EngineerDave
Bioengineer
- Aug 22, 2002
- 352
Using an SEM/EDS in identifying materials seems to be a bit of a stretch at times.
Since the accuracy of the EDS output is limited, how do you recommend to use this? Is it wiser to tell users that we can't positively identify a material with it, instead we can only give them a clue to what it can and can't be.
It is one thing to have a known and then find that your unknown sample is similar to the known. But when it is a true unknown (example surface contaminant, or unknown coating) what do you think?
Since the accuracy of the EDS output is limited, how do you recommend to use this? Is it wiser to tell users that we can't positively identify a material with it, instead we can only give them a clue to what it can and can't be.
It is one thing to have a known and then find that your unknown sample is similar to the known. But when it is a true unknown (example surface contaminant, or unknown coating) what do you think?