Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Inelastic displacement in P-delta effects

Status
Not open for further replies.
FOX89

FOX89

Structural
Sep 10, 2015
21
Hello Folks,

I have elevated vessel mounted on braced legs, for which i am verifying the seismic design. Going through ASCE 7-22, clause 15.4.6 as well as 15.7.10.3, the P-delta effects shall be based on inelastic seismic displacements which does make sense for such inverted pendulum like structure. How can this be achieved in the analysis model (say SAP2000) ? The default non-linear load case with p-delta effects will only consider displacement based on elastic analysis (divided by R), and if Cd was considered in the load case then the loads will increase which is not correct, so how the p-delta can be captured at the inelastic displacement level while maintaining the loads reduced by R ?

Your advise is much appreciated
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
You've posed a really good question. I don't think there is a simple answer. Maybe someone has a better idea than I do. But, I would probably do the following:

Look at the image below (which was from a presentation I did maybe 15 years ago).
Vo is whatever lateral loads you originally applied.
P is whatever gravity loads you originally applied.
Delta_o is the initial elastic deflection that results.
H is the height of the column.
The only difference is that you would amplify the Delta_o by Cd so that the secondary shear is really.
Vi = P*Delta_o*Cd / H

Then I'd apply this Vi (for a LINEAR analysis) in combination with my regular loading.
Secondary_Shear_Method_of_P-Delta_zqsvjt.png
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thanks Josh, the problem is that i need to do it at each time the loads are changed as the design progress.

I think i might define a non-linear load case with Cd*Eq to get the respective p-delta under inelastic displacement, then subtracted the same from load combination (linear subtract) to remove the load but while keeping p-delta effect. (i have to check it on SDOF model first)

 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I think i might define a non-linear load case with Cd*Eq to get the respective p-delta under inelastic displacement, then subtracted the same from load combination (linear subtract) to remove the load but while keeping p-delta effect. (i have to check it on SDOF model first)
Click to expand...

Yeah, that would probably work. If your software allows it. I was assuming that your software didn't allow anything so advanced.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Why don't you just reduce your R so that your deflections are realistic and then divide your stresses out by R for evaluation (or increase your allowables). Or do both runs and look at your comparative reactions and forces to see if it's even significant enough to worry about.

If you have the thing supported on a braced frame and there's a high center of gravity it's likely that the moment effects from the lateral load significantly govern over anything you're going to get out of P-Delta unless you have some strange stability situation happening.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

scottcraw1
  • Locked
  • Question
Inelastic Analysis of Post and Beam Railings
Replies
0
Views
97
scottcraw1
scottcraw1
E
  • Question
largest joint displacement in ETABS
Replies
0
Views
224
engineer_dick
E
SPR Baker
  • Locked
  • Question
P-delta Effect
Replies
6
Views
233
sticksandtriangles
sticksandtriangles
Jay_Chen
  • Question
Displacement limit for free standing canopy
Replies
1
Views
1K
KootK
KootK
edomingo
  • Question
Mat Foundation (1m) w/ Pedestals. Deep Beam Effects?
Replies
1
Views
644
TRAK.Structural
TRAK.Structural

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom