Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

IRC Portal Frame Question

XR250

Structural
Jan 30, 2013
5,934
Does anyone know if this is the capacity for both connectors combined or for each?
1745263761167.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I've always assumed that it's each. Scroll up to Figure R602.10.6.2 and it seems to say that the hold down capacity is an 'each' value and I believe the "Portal Frame for Engineered Applications" paper clarifies it as such.
 
Fair enough. A Simpson LPT4 does not have enough capacity in SPF. Would you consider adding some vertical timber screws to supplement?
 
Fair enough. A Simpson LPT4 does not have enough capacity in SPF. Would you consider adding some vertical timber screws to supplement?
I'd be hesitant to do that. Can you require longer fasteners to make up the difference?
 
Longer fasteners in the LPT4? What is you hesitation with timber screws to supplement? Honestly, I have a pretty wide wall segment on this one so I can use 4 clips but for argument's sake and future jobs I'd like to hear what you have to say.
 
Fair enough. A Simpson LPT4 does not have enough capacity in SPF. Would you consider adding some vertical timber screws to supplement?
I like how the footnotes say that an LTP4 satisfies the IRC requirements even though it clearly does not.
 
...satisfies the IRC requirements even though it clearly does not.
This is the issue I have with the IRC in general. A LOT of things don't calc out, or at least didn't when I last looked at it. At the time, I came to the conclusion that the IRC was for simple structures far away from high seismic and wind zones. But, that is a different thread. Sorry for the hijack in advance.
 
Longer fasteners in the LPT4? What is you hesitation with timber screws to supplement? Honestly, I have a pretty wide wall segment on this one so I can use 4 clips but for argument's sake and future jobs I'd like to hear what you have to say.
Mixing fastener types. Load sharing between different fastener types or configurations is pretty tough to predict, and is not always directly additive. So I avoid it where I can.

Yeah, the longer fasteners don't really work, do they? Not at a rim board. Might be worth using a length of coil strap?

LPT4 works for Southern Pine for the prescriptive code. They should probably expand on that a bit in the footnote, though.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor