Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Search results for query: *

  • Users: ozzy1
  • Order by date
  1. ozzy1

    Unknown Item

    The black square is Velcro.
  2. ozzy1

    Unknown Item

    We found the item buried behind some old chairs and a table. Nothing else around that would indicate its use.
  3. ozzy1

    Unknown Item

    Thanks guys. One for the museum maybe.
  4. ozzy1

    Unknown Item

    Commercial building, been empty for a while. Previous tenants unknown.
  5. ozzy1

    Unknown Item

    Found this in basement of new premises. Anybody know what this is?
  6. ozzy1

    The term Drill

    I am QC not engineering. We have a couple of young engineers that are using 'Drill' and then put a +/-.002 tolerance. I thought Drill had been removed by ASME at some point, obviously not from your comments. I will have to impress upon them that if they want a hole give a diameter plus the...
  7. ozzy1

    The term Drill

    Is the term 'Drill' still used and if it is doesn't Drill have it's own tolerance depending on drill size?
  8. ozzy1

    Datums

    Okay gentlemen I stand corrected. Thanks
  9. ozzy1

    Datums

    Attached are the pictures of sheet 1 and 2. It is my view that the call-outs in question should be detailed on the side view (3rd view down) on sheet 1 not on a cross section on sheet 2.
  10. ozzy1

    Datums

    I am head of QC in a manufacturing company full of engineers and I am constantly arguing with the engineers especially the younger right out of school types about the correct way to detail their drawings. The latest concerns Datums. This engineer continually places Datums on cross sections...
  11. ozzy1

    LMC

    Version ASME Y14.5M-1994 is the standard generally used here. Let me digest and get back to you later. Thanks much guys.
  12. ozzy1

    LMC

    Engineer is a young guy. We usually work well together but when we (QC) question something like this the reaction is 'well what the hell do you know you are just QC'.
  13. ozzy1

    LMC

    ASME
  14. ozzy1

    LMC

    Ok, lets say we stay with what the language is would you say the 1.763 insp. result is acceptable? In addition could detail how you think the language should be. Thanks
  15. ozzy1

    LMC

    The design engineers response to our question was; "As the slot becomes more oversize its location becomes less critical. At LMC The location can be off 0.010 more than at MMC." The dimension 1.753+/-.003 is measuring 1.763. Note: We rarely ever see LMC used and when we do it's nearly always...
  16. ozzy1

    LMC

    We are trying to establish if the LMC call out on the attached is applicable in this situation.Detail 20 Thanks Elton Hughes Q C Manager Napco Security Grouphttps://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=bc5e4bab-c5cc-4b19-a84c-c4f28ac719fa&file=MH121.jpg
  17. ozzy1

    LMC

    Thanks I will move the question over.
  18. ozzy1

    LMC

    We are trying to determine if the LMC called out on a drawing is truly applicable in this situation. Detail 20. Elton Hughes QC Manager Napco Security Grouphttps://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=db9be8b2-4482-49cc-9ff5-6cb909d96d75&file=MH121.jpg
  19. ozzy1

    Dawing Revisions

    Those that use a blank just refer to the drawing number.We do not have customer numbers since we are the design authority.We have other issues here where half of the product line has part numbers aswell as drawing numbers. That half starts with "A" for released drawings and numbers for pre-prod...
  20. ozzy1

    Dawing Revisions

    Actually we do not have any specific standards here. Everybody is allowed to do their own thing on the engineering design side even though our print notes start with "Interpret Drawing per ASME Y14.5-1994". The trouble with that is 90% of our engineers no nothing about GD&T. Our VP of...
Back
Top