Search results for query: *

Just take care your vendor open it as an assembly, not a part

I've see the thread [sorry for the duplicate] but when I try to do that it don't work. Let me explain, I make a dimension, let's say 100mm, then I switch view the dimension and -surprise- it's not 100mm, it's 83,456mm. I do have "allow_3d_dimensions" set to "yes". For UG, I find 3D dimensions...

hi, It's supposed wildfire 2 can manage 3d dimension in an isometric view but when I try to make a new dimension in such view is not real. It seems the value match the proyected dimension. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong or proe isn't capable of doing what I want. Other systems like...

Sorry, but I do not know the controller. I think you'll have to call Telemecanique of search in their web.

It sounds like a batery fault has corrupt memory. You'll have to check the controller parameters but I don't know "NUM 720 F". Where it comes from? Fanuc?... It looks like a model from ?

thanks to all. Finally we won't buy a Haas. The impression I have it's that it's not a bad machine, but it fails in spindle. The final decision will be after vacances.

My company is looking for a new vertical machinig center. One of the candidates is a HAAS machine. But I've read about some people having problems with them, a lot of repairs, not able to work 24 hours at day, etc. I'd like to read more opinions prior to take a decision.

I've read the thread and it's similar to the solution I'll have. But now I have one doubt more. I can replace the components by its names. But it'd be nice to have a name such as "plate_a" not "plate_a_245x245". I wonder if there is any way to change the name of the components or replace them...

finally the working code will be something like: INPUT ANOM STRING BNOM STRING CNOM STRING NOM2 STRING END INPUT RELATIONS NOM = ANOM +"x"+ BNOM + "x"+ CNOM END RELATIONS ............ ADD PART (NOM) INTERNAL COMPONENT ID 39 END ADD ADD PART (NOM2) INTERNAL COMPONENT ID 41 PADRES...

Hora, the error says that there is an error in the relations line. I've changed the program and haven't the same error.

I know this way but the problem it's that the parts I'm trying to insert come from a family table. I've tryed: INPUT param1 number param2 number param3 number END INPUT RELATIONS inst_name = lookup_inst( "PLAT_P_VAP.PRT", 1, "d5", param1, "A2", param2, "B", param3) END RELATIONS...

hi, I have an assembly that includes some parts from family tables. I want to control the size of all these parts from the assembly itself. I thought that using some variables I can resize the entire assembly. The problem it's that my pro/program is limited and the help does not help me so...

I use proe, it works ok on large assemblies. When you now it it's easy to use but needs some learning. To draw on 2D I use curves with the powerfull sketcher in 3D and show it in 2D (good acotation). I've also used solid edge, in 2D-drawing it would be probably the most versatile and powerfull...

The cost will be the same for the three. The ofer is the Cincinnati machine with one of these three for the same price. I have a Fagor control 8050 but I'm limited. When I try to work by point postprocessed tape, the feedrate is limited to 2500 mm/sg aprox. The 8050 has very little go-ahead...

I live in Spain, and the post processor it's not a problem since I use Pro/e and haave the possibility to create one for myself. The problem I have is that I am not able to determine what kind of control would be better.

My company wants to buy a CNC machine. We have an ofer for a Cincinnati CFV 1050 with 3 options: 1/ Siemens Sinumerik 810D, or 2/ GE Fanuc 18i-MB, or 3/ Heidenhain iTNC 530 I don't know the diferences among them to take a decisition. We are mold makers. what do you think would be better? thnxs...

I use Pro/NC and I have a machining drawing. I give this drawing to the operator containing the tools. The drawing has a table that automatically contains the tool name and number so he puts the tools in the correct order

I've used Proe for 3 years and now I have in mind to change to delcam's powermill. From my experience proe 2001 is not reliable. I've seen powermill and it has all the capabilities you want. People say is 100% collision free guaranted.

A possibility is to import geometry from another model. Start a new part and insert geometry from the original model. Select the coordinate system by default and the surfaces you are interested in. To make an assembly is easy because all the coordinate systems are relative to the original. But...

Hi, Does anyone knows this cam program? I'd like to know if it's a good choice or the problems it has.