Thank you for the replies.
Attached is the drawing for more clarification.
The only difference between the -1 and -2 are the finish steps and that is due to the fact that threaded inserts were added to create the -1.
The -2 is the base part of the -1 assembly. There are no physical changes to...
We have a part that is used in two (2) different ways. It is basically a mounting bracket made of aluminum sheet metal, bent @90 degrees.
Mechanically/Functionally the only difference between the two (2) parts is that one utilizes threaded inserts and one does not.
We have a -2 version...
We are bending sheet metal to create a razorback for an equipment rack. It will be one length of sheet with multiple triangular bends like so:
b
a_________/ \___/ \__/ \___/ \__c
The bends are to be right angles (90 degree) at the peaks and aprox 135 degree at the crest.
Speaking strictly...
So we have a part, it is a flat piece of aluminum, 0.25" thick.
This part has multiple features; 3 different hole patterns, 10 different radii and 2 angles.
We are using the top view of the part to best show all the features.
When everything is dimensioned (using standard linear dimensioning) on...
Thank you for the reply. No, these are not to be pressurized, this is simply a structural design.
My question isn't about the tubing application, my question is simply "what is the standard for showing pipe/tube coping"?
Good morning all,
I am trying to figure out the best way to show a pipe coping detail in a drawing using AutoDesk Inventor.
I have a length of aluminum tubing that needs coping at both ends. Some of the coping is 90 degree some are different angles.
Is it typical to just give a diameter and an...
Is there anything in the ASME/ANSI/MIL standards that states how a parts list description should be writen? For hardware specifically.
In my years of working on govt drawing packages majority of the descriptions I wrote (or wrote by following suite of the pre-cursor dwgs) listed what the part...
