fromtherafters
Structural
- Apr 8, 2014
- 9
In working with Figure 3.11.5.6-6 in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Manual, I am finding conflicting opinions on how to handle the increased embedment of 1.2D. I consulted a Geotechnical engineer who stated the 1.2D is performed to achieve a F.S.=1.5. I reviewed references stating the 1.2 factor is used to account for differences between the simplified method and the conventional method and is not a factor of safety. Those references would apply a factor of safety by reducing the passive pressure (as I would commonly do), find the point of moment equilibrium and finally increase the embedment by 20% when using the simplified method.
I would appreciate it if anyone could share their thoughts, experiences or perhaps references that reinforce either position. Thank you in advance.
I would appreciate it if anyone could share their thoughts, experiences or perhaps references that reinforce either position. Thank you in advance.