Vegas125
Structural
- May 9, 2012
- 11
Hello,
meshing complicated geometries is a lot easier with tetraeder elements, than it is with hexaeder elements. Using quadratic tetraeder elements seems to yield acceptable results, when one compares results of C3D20R hexaeder- and C3D10R-elements. But when I use C3D10R-elements, or a combination of C3D10R-elements and C3D8R-hexaeder-elements, my dynamic implicit time simulations only converge at much smaller timesteps, thereby increasing calculation time a lot.
Is there a way to improve the speed of dynamic implicit calculations with tetraeder models, or combined tetraeder&hexaeder models?
meshing complicated geometries is a lot easier with tetraeder elements, than it is with hexaeder elements. Using quadratic tetraeder elements seems to yield acceptable results, when one compares results of C3D20R hexaeder- and C3D10R-elements. But when I use C3D10R-elements, or a combination of C3D10R-elements and C3D8R-hexaeder-elements, my dynamic implicit time simulations only converge at much smaller timesteps, thereby increasing calculation time a lot.
Is there a way to improve the speed of dynamic implicit calculations with tetraeder models, or combined tetraeder&hexaeder models?