Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Abaqus Dynamic Implicit Calculations slow with tetraeder elements?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vegas125

Structural
May 9, 2012
11
Hello,

meshing complicated geometries is a lot easier with tetraeder elements, than it is with hexaeder elements. Using quadratic tetraeder elements seems to yield acceptable results, when one compares results of C3D20R hexaeder- and C3D10R-elements. But when I use C3D10R-elements, or a combination of C3D10R-elements and C3D8R-hexaeder-elements, my dynamic implicit time simulations only converge at much smaller timesteps, thereby increasing calculation time a lot.

Is there a way to improve the speed of dynamic implicit calculations with tetraeder models, or combined tetraeder&hexaeder models?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Ah, I think I was mistaken. By changing the boundary conditions of this model, I was able to improve the maximum stepsize. Mea culpa. I tend to run into convergence problems more often when I use tetraeder elements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor