Lihsus
Geotechnical
- Feb 16, 2017
- 1
thread261-314949
I was following the referenced thread because i am facing pretty similar issues with my CBR curves. I have 2 set of Standard CBR results (Both GM soil, approx. 18% fines on both). In both tests, the dry density at the maximum blows (65 blows) are slightly less than the Maximum Dry Density, So i had to extrapolate the curve to get the CBR value at 100% of max dry density. And also, the CBR values at lower blows are higher than CBR values at higher blows.
Test 1 (Max Dry Density from Std Proctor = 132.1 pcf)
20 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 129.1 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 13.35%
35 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 129.7 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 10.52%
65 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 131.2 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 10.68%
Final recommended CBR value (@100% max. dry density) = 15.6% (Which i don't think is unusual). Similar results on Test 2 as well. Both similar materials. The Stress vs Penetration curves are also abnormal for the three points (curves crossing each other multiple times and not widely spaced).
Any insights will be greatly appreciated.
I was following the referenced thread because i am facing pretty similar issues with my CBR curves. I have 2 set of Standard CBR results (Both GM soil, approx. 18% fines on both). In both tests, the dry density at the maximum blows (65 blows) are slightly less than the Maximum Dry Density, So i had to extrapolate the curve to get the CBR value at 100% of max dry density. And also, the CBR values at lower blows are higher than CBR values at higher blows.
Test 1 (Max Dry Density from Std Proctor = 132.1 pcf)
20 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 129.1 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 13.35%
35 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 129.7 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 10.52%
65 blows----Dry Unit Wt. = 131.2 pcf------CBR at 0.1 in penetration = 10.68%
Final recommended CBR value (@100% max. dry density) = 15.6% (Which i don't think is unusual). Similar results on Test 2 as well. Both similar materials. The Stress vs Penetration curves are also abnormal for the three points (curves crossing each other multiple times and not widely spaced).
Any insights will be greatly appreciated.