Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Another Miami Beach condominium with structural problems 9

Status
Not open for further replies.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I wonder how many buildings have undergone emergency repairs to avoid this fate?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
EdStainless said:
I wonder how many buildings have undergone emergency repairs to avoid this fate?
I was wondering the exact same thing, at the very least I'm sure there are some structural engineers making a fortune off the inspections!
 
50 years is far too long for a building in that environment... maybe 10...

-----*****-----
So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik
 
50yr is a major benchmark. I don't recall the actual inspection schedule, but it is more frequent than that.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
[URL unfurl="true" said:
https://www.westonfl.org/government/building-code-services/40-year-building-inspection-program[/URL]]On 9/8/22 the Broward County Board of Rules and Appeals (BORA) adopted new regulations for Building Inspections (commonly known as the 40-Year Inspection Program). Per BORA, the Program was revised to be consistent with the requirements of Florida law, Senate Bill 4-D and took into consideration revisions made by Miami Dade County.

The major change to the program is that buildings will now be required to have that initial inspection at 30 years of age instead of 40. Structures that are 30-39 years of age will have until 12/31/24 to complete that first inspection.

Certain buildings within 3 miles of the coastline are now required to have the first inspection at 25 years of age.
 
Swashbucking politicians and lawyer/scum to the rescue !!!!.... YAYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!

... are you a Broward County lawyer or Real Estate professional ??? ... You can make your guess too !!!!!


....and my personal opinion is..... First building inspection for structures within 3 miles of the coast at 15 years then every 5 years after that !!!


What is your guess ?..... How would you handle this thorny issue ?..... America's property millionaires await your answer !!!

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer
 
Given the Champlain Towers owners already had an inspection and an engineers report that used words like exponential deterioration I think the problem is less the inspection schedule and more the need for enforcement and for reserved funds to take action. The inspection did not condemn the building outright and demand evacuation, but how many would have?
 
More info ....


Mercado’s engineers, who are doing The Port Royale’s 50-year recertification, said they had discovered a growing crack and deflection in a main beam in the building’s garage, meaning the beam was bending or moving away from its intended position.

“We believe this beam and the other beams located in the third-floor garage might support the entire building structure,” an inspector and an engineer for Inspection Engineers Inc. wrote in a letter to the city dated Thursday, though they said that was based on observation because they don’t have the building’s original structural calculations
.


You know,.... both the structural engineers and the graph paper that /beam calculations are done on, tend to crumble and wrinkle-up after 50 years

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer
 
I'm sure all that stuff is on file with the building department. The point of having records is to KEEP records. For later.

That's why building permit fees are so high--because of the cost of properly storing these records.

The permit fees for CTS were $45,000. Much of that fee undoubtedly went to organizing and storing the records. Same should hold for this building.

Anyway, it is interesting when it's announced that a crack has been almost visibly growing in a concrete structure. Surely a "cause for alarm", as Emily Guglielmo might phrase it.


spsalso
 
You state:

"I'm sure all that stuff is on file with the building department. The point of having records is to KEEP records. For later."


Well, I kinda doubt that copies of (50 year old) structural calculations (and the assumptions therein) are retained by the building department.

I have never heard of calculation retention .... Lots of long term liabilty there !!!

PE stamped drawings, single lines, specs etc .... Yes, yes... of course !!

I would like to hear from experienced geezer Structural Engineers !!


Are your strength calculations for masonry buildings retained by building departments ?

What is your experience for review of your work decades after the structure goes up ?

Anyone??....?????

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer
 
The building codes were different 50 years ago, the concrete used for buildings generally had less strength than what is used now, the quality control was less, and on and on. Add to that the environmental conditions that the concrete is exposed to.
 
bimr said:
The building codes were different 50 years ago, the concrete used for buildings generally had less strength than what is used now, the quality control was less, and on and on. Add to that the environmental conditions that the concrete is exposed to.
I agree but because of the known weaknesses and the lack of sophisticated calculating systems many times they used huge overkill's of materials to ensure adequate strength. Much different compared to today's world where we calculate to the nth degree and have slim margins so corners are shaped real thin due to budget constraints.
 
My guess is that they believe that to be the case, but cannot prove it. Conceivably, the building could fall in the time it took to do so.



spsalso
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top