Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

API 650/620 Tank Secondary Containment Issues

Status
Not open for further replies.

drials2

Mechanical
Nov 21, 2013
9
Guys,

I'm running into some resistance when I try to justify why I do not want electrical/process equipment inside the dike walls around tanks. We need a run down cooler to cool some condensate and
"they" want to place these coolers inside the dike. Every site I have worked this has not been done, and looking through API 650 and RP 500 I cannot seem to find a justification to prevent this. Is this practice just a good plant construction rule of thumb or is there a standard I can fall back on? Thanks for your experiences and your input.

DR
Project Manager.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Site NFPA - putting electrical equipment below the "high water" line* is an unacceptable risk, especially if any of the tanks may contain flammables.

*At Fukushima, the intakes for the emergency diesel generators ended up below the high water mark. Thus started the disaster.
 
Can you provide what product is in the tanks? Obviously, water tanks have different restrictions than hydrocarbon tanks.
 
Thanks Duwe6,

Which NFPA standard are you siting? (Also, "they" are banking on Class 1 Div 2 electrical for protectation; as a caveat).
 
Yes, forgive me, it is stabilized crude condensate (light petroleum liquid).
 
I believe Duwe6 is citing NFPA 30 - Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code
 
With light petroleum, NFPA-30 is exactly right. However, Div 2 may be too lenient - their items may be submerged for hours, if not days. If it was water, NEC - National Electric Code [NFPA-70] would have had to suffice [switch gear & motors under water].
 
drials2 Why not elevate the pumps and tank if it needs to be inside the diked area. Code wise I am not sure there is really a rule against it. I have process pumps inside of a methanol containment. To make that situation better we opted for vertical centrifugal pumps so the motors are above the containment, but I don't think that there was a code that said we could not have them on the ground. Just being cautious lead us to put the vertical pumps in.

Regards
StoneColdEngineer
 
". . could not have them on the ground"

API & NFPA allow placing motors 'on the ground', just not below hydrocarbon level inside a containment.

BTW, using a vertical-shaft pump and placing the motor above the top of the dike is good engineering -- I'll be stealing that idea. Thanx!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor