tjacorn
Structural
- Jan 9, 2006
- 8
Our architect wants get away from cantilevering joists when building balconies due to water problems (joist rot) over time. So instead he wants to use brackets to support the balcony.
My analysis shows that this creates a bending moment in the wall, which I will counter with a 4x4 or 6x6 column in the wall. This, however, will create a lateral force on the diaphragm that will be picked up by shear walls. So far I’ve been able to design the shear wall and diaphragm but I’m hung up on the connections between the top of the column and the diaphragm. The bracket (which is placing a 1000 ft-lb factored load on the column) will be bolted both to the Rim-board and to the column.
Questions:
1) How should I go about designing the connection so that the rim board won’t be ripped out of the diaphragm?
2) Is this the proper approach for designing with brackets? In the past, the architect placed a steel column in the wall embedded in the concrete below to resist the induced moment. Surely there’s a better way…
My analysis shows that this creates a bending moment in the wall, which I will counter with a 4x4 or 6x6 column in the wall. This, however, will create a lateral force on the diaphragm that will be picked up by shear walls. So far I’ve been able to design the shear wall and diaphragm but I’m hung up on the connections between the top of the column and the diaphragm. The bracket (which is placing a 1000 ft-lb factored load on the column) will be bolted both to the Rim-board and to the column.
Questions:
1) How should I go about designing the connection so that the rim board won’t be ripped out of the diaphragm?
2) Is this the proper approach for designing with brackets? In the past, the architect placed a steel column in the wall embedded in the concrete below to resist the induced moment. Surely there’s a better way…