Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Beam188 conflicts with other contacts

Status
Not open for further replies.

AnBil

Mechanical
Sep 22, 2015
1
Hi all!

I am TOTALLY new to Ansys Mechanical APDL, so my question might sound quite basic, anyway, I´m totally stacked right now and I haven´t found much information in the literature available.

My simplified geometry (which intends to be applied in a bigger model)consists on a squared plate with a screw in the middle of it, where I apply a displacement. This plate represents a sandwich honeycomb panel, so it is composed of a middle core (solid), and two surfaces (top and bottom from it), all "sticked" with contacts.

I am trying to simplify this geometry and I am currently trying to model the screw with a Beam188 element. My intention is that this is done automatically, so I am trying to develop an extension for that. As an initial point, I have introduced the coordinates where the Beam would be located manually. This is the input APDL part that I have written so far:

*GET,n_el,ELEM,0,num,max
*GET,mat1, ELEM,n_el,ATTR,MAT


!Nodes
n, 1, -0.1, 0.001, -0.1
n, 2, -0.1, 0.02, -0.1
n, 3, -0.2, 0.02, -0.1

propRadius=0.001
propK=0.5
l=0.01

!Beam type
et,100,beam188
SECTYPE, 4, BEAM,CSOLID, 1, 0
SECOFFSET, CENT
SECDATA, propRadius, 8, 2
KEYOPT, 100, 1, 0
KEYOPT, 100, 3, 2
KEYOPT, 100, 9, 0

!Material properties
mp, ex, 16, 1592
mp, ey, 16, 1592
mp, ez, 16, 1592
mp, nuxy, 16, 0.3

!Element connection and orientation
en, 100, 1, 2, 3


!Displacement boundary conditions
d, 1, ux, 0
d, 1, uy, 0
d, 1, uz, 0
d, 1, rotx, 0
d, 1, roty, 0
d, 1, rotz, 0

!Applied force
f, 2, fy, F
eplot
fini

/solu

When I solve in Ansys Mechanical, I obtaine the following error in the file.err:

"The behavior of target elements specified by real constant 4 are not consistent. Some of elements belong to a rigid surface, while others belong to a deformable surface."

Real constant 4 is referred to the contact between the core and bottom surface of the honeycomb panel. I haven´t been able to find any solution or any clear reason to know why this happens. As far as I have checked, Beam 188 is a flexible beam and the contacts between the surfaces have also been set as flexible. For sure I am missing something which is crucial in the model, but due to my lack of experience I am not able to solve it. If anyone could throw some light, I would be really thankful.

Greetings,

AnBil
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor