seamantgn
Petroleum
- Feb 7, 2013
- 10
I'm designing a vertical BEM 1000x6096 mm - 2 passes HE.
Process guys gave me a Tema sheet of the exchanger showing a sketch with the nozzles fixed to the low head.
For me was odd but i performed the calculation with that arrange.
After i talked with a experieced colleague and he suggest me why not weld the heads to the main flanges to save the material and weld of the intermediate shells.
I perform the calculations again and for me look very odd. The reason it's i never saw a horizontal 2 passes BEM with this type of design; the rear end with the main flange welded to the head. In the TEMA std the examples have a intermedia te shell.
I ask to a process guy if will work well. The guy said me that was ok but he din't simulate it in his HTRI....
I work in engineering company then i don't know if this type of design will have manufacturing problems. I think may be weld 2 - 10 nps noozles without pad to a 1000 mm head, and weld the partion plate and the main flange must be up to make a pwht. Or if are some manufacturing problem.
Also i don't perform the thermal calculations. I ask to my self if with this design don't have problems due to hidráulic losses or other issues.
I think if it's rare this design will have reasons to not use it.
Some experienced heat exchanger designer can give me a hand o view point.
Thanks
Regards
Process guys gave me a Tema sheet of the exchanger showing a sketch with the nozzles fixed to the low head.
For me was odd but i performed the calculation with that arrange.
After i talked with a experieced colleague and he suggest me why not weld the heads to the main flanges to save the material and weld of the intermediate shells.
I perform the calculations again and for me look very odd. The reason it's i never saw a horizontal 2 passes BEM with this type of design; the rear end with the main flange welded to the head. In the TEMA std the examples have a intermedia te shell.
I ask to a process guy if will work well. The guy said me that was ok but he din't simulate it in his HTRI....
I work in engineering company then i don't know if this type of design will have manufacturing problems. I think may be weld 2 - 10 nps noozles without pad to a 1000 mm head, and weld the partion plate and the main flange must be up to make a pwht. Or if are some manufacturing problem.
Also i don't perform the thermal calculations. I ask to my self if with this design don't have problems due to hidráulic losses or other issues.
I think if it's rare this design will have reasons to not use it.
Some experienced heat exchanger designer can give me a hand o view point.
Thanks
Regards