Ussuri
Civil/Environmental
- May 7, 2004
- 1,580
There is a discussion ongoing on the structural engineering forum regarding the current range of HP calculators.
I was unable to comment on the discussion as I have tried a HP a few times and didn't like it. I didn't like the Reverse Polish Notation (RPN) system. I currently use a Casio CFX-9850G which uses the DAL (Direct Algebraic Logic or something similar) system. I have had it a number of years and cannot fault it. However, I seem to be alone in my department as most everyone uses a HP with RPN.
Why does RPN seem more popular? Is it a better operating method for calculators? Should I bite the bullet, ditch my Casio and move over to a HP?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The world keeps turning, it keeps me in my place; where I stand is only three miles from space"
Spiritualized
I was unable to comment on the discussion as I have tried a HP a few times and didn't like it. I didn't like the Reverse Polish Notation (RPN) system. I currently use a Casio CFX-9850G which uses the DAL (Direct Algebraic Logic or something similar) system. I have had it a number of years and cannot fault it. However, I seem to be alone in my department as most everyone uses a HP with RPN.
Why does RPN seem more popular? Is it a better operating method for calculators? Should I bite the bullet, ditch my Casio and move over to a HP?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The world keeps turning, it keeps me in my place; where I stand is only three miles from space"
Spiritualized