Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Cantilever Abutment Retaining Wall founded on Bedrock - Lateral Earth Pressure Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

CivilEng_1stopshop

Civil/Environmental
Jul 31, 2022
2
Overturning_Schematic_post_c6ygpl.jpg


I am designing a concrete abutment where the footer shall be completely keyed into solid bedrock. My question is - can I reduce the wall height dimension used to compute the horizontal earth pressure and live load surcharge forces acting on the wall to just be from top of wall to top of footer? My firm currently calculates these loads based on the height being from top of wall to bottom of footer, regardless of soil conditions.. I have reviewed many sets of Construction Plans in the last couple of years that have been designed by others, and when I check their abutment designs by running the calcs myself, my footer width is always much larger unless the Plans that I am 'checking' have the foundation bearing in soils rather than bedrock.

This is my first thread post in this forum - I tried to attach an image to help better describe my question, I hope all can see it. The top schematic shows that the abutment footer shall be completely keyed into rock and sloped structure backfill shall be placed/compacted on top of it. The schematic below it shows the corresponding horizontal loads that I want to calculate for the situation. My desire for reducing the wall height if the footer shall not have structure backfill placed behind it is to reduce the horizontal forces, which shall in most times help with overturning and enable me to reduce the overall footer width.

- Thanks in advance -
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

...can I reduce the wall height dimension used to compute the horizontal earth pressure and live load surcharge forces acting on the wall to just be from top of wall to top of footer footing?

I would, your explanation and sketch seem logical.

Imagine the footing being plucked out of the excavation (leaving an empty hole in the rock). If the rock immediately behind this hole can support the surcharge load without "crumbling", this rock is not going to apply any horizontal load to the footing.

 
I agree with SlideRuleEra.

Only time I would recommend a load to the bottom of your footing would be if there was an unbalanced water pressure. In that case, I would use water pressure to the base of the footing.

 
I would talk to my seniors to find out the philosophy behind that conservative practice. Note you might find out some good reasons to make you have a second thought. If not, the change of approach shall be uniform within the company.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor