brian200000
Mechanical
- Aug 1, 2005
- 2
Hi,
does anyone have experience designing/sizing wet vacuum system piping? If so, I'd appreciate your comments on the system problem described below.
thanks
Brian
=======================================================
Our system consists of 3 liquid ring vacuum pumps (300m3/hr each) and a collection tank with 100mm (4 inch) header housed in the utilities building which is connected to a 100mm diameter (4 inch) header spread throughout the factory building. The factory header runs about 5 meters above ground level and the drops to drains are typically 25mm (1 inch) in diameter.
The pumps and tank in the utilities building maintain a vacuum at -80kPa and are also 5 meters above ground level. The header leaves the utility building, drops down 5 meters, travels under the road and rises 5 meters again to the factory header, ie. its forms a huge u-trap between the buildings.
The system has been running like this for 8 yrs but frequently locks up and frequently requires vacuum pump replacements. I was asked to spec a new vacuum pump and investigate the system.
I think the U-bend in the header is a problem but can't explain exactly why. At first I thought the U-bend is probably always flooded but if it is always flooded it wouldn't suck a vacuum downstream and yet it does. Therefore it must only be partially flooded in the horizontal section under the road allowing some air to pass by on the top of the pipe. But if its only partially flooded, then how does the water get sucked upwards to collection tank?
All I can think of is that the system is sucking water vapour caused by the vacuum pressure. This probably works fine when only small amounts of water are introduced to the system but when a large slug of water hits, the U-bend gets flooded and suction stops until water is evaporated off again. If this is the case, then the partially flooded pipe section is effectively reducing the 100mm header to only a fraction of that.
Does this make sense to anyone else?
could the U-bend be causing the lockups? Should the U-bend be eliminated? Should high level wet vac headers be drained by gravity to collection tanks
Web searches for wet vac system design turn up nothing so I'd appreciate any comments from other engineers.
thanks
Brian
does anyone have experience designing/sizing wet vacuum system piping? If so, I'd appreciate your comments on the system problem described below.
thanks
Brian
=======================================================
Our system consists of 3 liquid ring vacuum pumps (300m3/hr each) and a collection tank with 100mm (4 inch) header housed in the utilities building which is connected to a 100mm diameter (4 inch) header spread throughout the factory building. The factory header runs about 5 meters above ground level and the drops to drains are typically 25mm (1 inch) in diameter.
The pumps and tank in the utilities building maintain a vacuum at -80kPa and are also 5 meters above ground level. The header leaves the utility building, drops down 5 meters, travels under the road and rises 5 meters again to the factory header, ie. its forms a huge u-trap between the buildings.
The system has been running like this for 8 yrs but frequently locks up and frequently requires vacuum pump replacements. I was asked to spec a new vacuum pump and investigate the system.
I think the U-bend in the header is a problem but can't explain exactly why. At first I thought the U-bend is probably always flooded but if it is always flooded it wouldn't suck a vacuum downstream and yet it does. Therefore it must only be partially flooded in the horizontal section under the road allowing some air to pass by on the top of the pipe. But if its only partially flooded, then how does the water get sucked upwards to collection tank?
All I can think of is that the system is sucking water vapour caused by the vacuum pressure. This probably works fine when only small amounts of water are introduced to the system but when a large slug of water hits, the U-bend gets flooded and suction stops until water is evaporated off again. If this is the case, then the partially flooded pipe section is effectively reducing the 100mm header to only a fraction of that.
Does this make sense to anyone else?
could the U-bend be causing the lockups? Should the U-bend be eliminated? Should high level wet vac headers be drained by gravity to collection tanks
Web searches for wet vac system design turn up nothing so I'd appreciate any comments from other engineers.
thanks
Brian