sac, NO, that system is not superior to a system that centrally cools/dehumidifies and reheats to provide comfort. By using such a system, you are bordering on a technology for which you will likely not be able to hire sufficient automatic temperature control (ATC) expertise.
My first question: who is driving the guideline of 55 ± 2% relative humidity? Obviously someone who is not familiar with mechanical engineering and HVAC. The control need is in the moisture content, not the relative humidity, as a room can be 80°F and 55% relative humidity and be a swamp, or 40°F and 55% relative humidity and be dry enough to make your skin flake and create static shocks.
If you need to maintain 55% relative humidity, you need absolutely precise room temperature control; fluctuations of greater than about 1°F will continuously put you either high or low out of a two percent humidity range. Then you must ask at what room temperature is the 55% relative humidity required.
I need to close this - it's late and I need to go to bed, but I'm seeing this more and more - projects where the need is driven by someone who doesn't have the understanding of the physics that provide the need, and who may not fully understand the result of their request. I don't mean to sound crass, but relative humidity control to me is sort of like trying to control the location of the moon with respect to your house... It's all relative and in humidity's application, based wholly on temperature. Relative humidity is more a result than a control parameter. Re-post if you have any further info on this requirement. Thanks, CB