nastranuser123
Structural
Hi,
I have asked this question Siemens UG NX community as well.
But, since this question is a general question related to contact analysis, I thought of asking in thsi community as well.
My mesh is of master and slave contact edges is not a confirmal mesh (i.e. the nodes of master and slave edges / region do not coincide).
In that case, is it a good practice to define two contact pairs ? That is : one pair slecting region 1 as source and region 2 as target and then another pair with source and target sapped (i.e. region 1 as target and region 2 as source).
Is this a good practise?
Or, will it make the problem over-constrained? I guess it would suit the purpose as it would create a symmetrical contact.
Thanks.
I have asked this question Siemens UG NX community as well.
But, since this question is a general question related to contact analysis, I thought of asking in thsi community as well.
My mesh is of master and slave contact edges is not a confirmal mesh (i.e. the nodes of master and slave edges / region do not coincide).
In that case, is it a good practice to define two contact pairs ? That is : one pair slecting region 1 as source and region 2 as target and then another pair with source and target sapped (i.e. region 1 as target and region 2 as source).
Is this a good practise?
Or, will it make the problem over-constrained? I guess it would suit the purpose as it would create a symmetrical contact.
Thanks.