12345abc6ttyui67
Structural
- Jan 8, 2018
- 197
Hey everyone,
I have essentially zero experience with masonry / residential buildings - my entire career has been industrial / steelwork.
So, personal favour: I recently viewed a house which I am considering buying. It's in the UK, the two story main house was built approx. 1990 and a two story extension was added approx. 2005. The extension probably doubled the floor area or thereabouts. The house is essentially rectangular (except a small reception room to one side) and is very standard. There are no huge openings, no oddly shaped walls, etc.
A home survey report was carried out by a surveyor as per Scottish legislation, which lists all aspects of the house as Category 1 (i.e. no concerns).
Upon viewing the house, I noticed a crack in the roughcast running from the top of the brick level right up to roof level. The survey report also notes this crack and suggests it is superficial and that, worst case, the roughcast will need to be re-applied at some point in the future. I am OK with this, and it seems like the most likely scenario.
What I am wondering is: could this be more serious? should there have been a movement / expansion joint between the old house and the extension (it looks as though something like this has been done in the brickwork)? should this have been carried up through the roughcast? could the cracked roughcast be hiding a serious issue, or is it indeed likely to just be superficial / cosmetic damage due to a bit of differential movement / expansion?
Just looking for a consensus on whether this is potentially a big problem or just likely to be cosmetic.
I have essentially zero experience with masonry / residential buildings - my entire career has been industrial / steelwork.
So, personal favour: I recently viewed a house which I am considering buying. It's in the UK, the two story main house was built approx. 1990 and a two story extension was added approx. 2005. The extension probably doubled the floor area or thereabouts. The house is essentially rectangular (except a small reception room to one side) and is very standard. There are no huge openings, no oddly shaped walls, etc.
A home survey report was carried out by a surveyor as per Scottish legislation, which lists all aspects of the house as Category 1 (i.e. no concerns).
Upon viewing the house, I noticed a crack in the roughcast running from the top of the brick level right up to roof level. The survey report also notes this crack and suggests it is superficial and that, worst case, the roughcast will need to be re-applied at some point in the future. I am OK with this, and it seems like the most likely scenario.
What I am wondering is: could this be more serious? should there have been a movement / expansion joint between the old house and the extension (it looks as though something like this has been done in the brickwork)? should this have been carried up through the roughcast? could the cracked roughcast be hiding a serious issue, or is it indeed likely to just be superficial / cosmetic damage due to a bit of differential movement / expansion?
Just looking for a consensus on whether this is potentially a big problem or just likely to be cosmetic.