Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Defining springs using connection section

Status
Not open for further replies.

ronaldkoets

Mechanical
Sep 15, 2011
8
I would like to connect two points with spring-like elements, one spring parallel and one spring perpendicular. (note: the springs have the same coördinates)

Model 1:
The first thing i did was using Spring2 elements: First i defined a CSYS at an angle of 45 degrees, because this is perpendicular to the force. I coupled point a to point b first en used spring orientation 1 (parallel), than i coupled point a to point b for the second time and used spring orientation 2 (perpendicular). So far so good and the results looks great.

Model 2:
But now i would like to use non-linear springs and therefore i need to use connectors. Again i drew a wire feature between point a and b, created a section by using the section manager and selected translational type: axial. After that i used the connection section assignment manager to pick the wire feature between point a and b, as orientation i used the global CSYS (modified with 45 degrees) (parallel to force). After this i did the same things again for the perpendicular spring but now i used a modified CSYS with -45 degrees. For one or another reason, this doesn't work. : (zero pivot warnings)

Model 3:
After this i tried to model it in an another way. I defined a wire feature between point a and b, and now i selected the cartesian connecter type. But this also doesn't work. (negative eigenvalues and zero pivot warnings)

Who can help me with this problem?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

hey! have you solved the problem?
I have the same problem...connectors from a point to ground work.
I cannot understand why any connector between 2 points of 2 different part don't work..
any suggestion?
stefano
 
Dear Stefano,

The problem is probably because of the connection is underconstrained, it helps when you define an extra BC in the third direction

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor