handofthelion
Structural
- Jul 7, 2014
- 24
Hi all,
I have a quick question about the formula presented in AS 5100.5:2017 (Australian bridge code for concrete) for the effective second moment of area:
This formula seems counter-intuitive to me - as the service moment (M*s) increases, so does the effective second moment of area. I thought this should be the other way around as increased moment leads to further development of flexural cracking and therefore a less stiff section. This would also be in line with the formula in AS 3600, in which an increase in the service moment results in a decrease of stiffness.
Keen to hear everyone's thoughts on this, thanks!
my structural engineering blog
I have a quick question about the formula presented in AS 5100.5:2017 (Australian bridge code for concrete) for the effective second moment of area:
This formula seems counter-intuitive to me - as the service moment (M*s) increases, so does the effective second moment of area. I thought this should be the other way around as increased moment leads to further development of flexural cracking and therefore a less stiff section. This would also be in line with the formula in AS 3600, in which an increase in the service moment results in a decrease of stiffness.
Keen to hear everyone's thoughts on this, thanks!
my structural engineering blog