cgstrucg
Structural
- Mar 21, 2018
- 135
Hello,
I am working on the design of a roof beam system which has a lot of beams @ around 6 ft spacing and span length is 30 ft. While computing beam uplift, I have to consider the effective area for members. Traditionally effective area is span length multiplied by trib width which in this case is 6ft x 30ft. But for roof component and cladding load is higher and as far as I understand from ASCE, I have to take effective area as span length multiplied by span length/3 that is 10ft x 10ft/3.
My question is - I got my uplift value say 30 psf using span length/3. When I am putting these uplift values in STAAD, do I use 30psf * span length * span length/3 or 30psf * span length * actual trib width. I am sorry if it is confusing so just giving it another try -
1. Used span length/3 to get Uplift Value
2. Shall I use span length/3 when converting 30 psf to plf like 30 psf*span length/3(3.333ft) or shall I use actual trib load like 30psf*6ft.
Thanks
I am working on the design of a roof beam system which has a lot of beams @ around 6 ft spacing and span length is 30 ft. While computing beam uplift, I have to consider the effective area for members. Traditionally effective area is span length multiplied by trib width which in this case is 6ft x 30ft. But for roof component and cladding load is higher and as far as I understand from ASCE, I have to take effective area as span length multiplied by span length/3 that is 10ft x 10ft/3.
My question is - I got my uplift value say 30 psf using span length/3. When I am putting these uplift values in STAAD, do I use 30psf * span length * span length/3 or 30psf * span length * actual trib width. I am sorry if it is confusing so just giving it another try -
1. Used span length/3 to get Uplift Value
2. Shall I use span length/3 when converting 30 psf to plf like 30 psf*span length/3(3.333ft) or shall I use actual trib load like 30psf*6ft.
Thanks