Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Experimental study on Minimum distance between welds 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

sachu660

Mechanical
Oct 7, 2019
1
Dear all members,
I would like to invite all members to participate in this forum regarding discussion on defining minimum distance between welds. I know this questions has been asked many times in the past and answered but not with the exact technical explanation. I am a Researcher and will be conducting a experimental study on the topic but would like to consult all the practical engineers, inspectors, fabricators, contractors, clients, consultants out there before making a plan for this study. So i would like to ask some questions from all members and would like to review some initial study I have made till date.
Why proximity distance is maintained between welds Most international codes and specifications require a minimum distance (4T/5T/1D/1.5D) between two adjacent welds. Minimum distance is recommended to avoid adverse effect on the mechanical performance of the welded joint. e.g. fatigue and fracture of the weld-on-weld related to offshore structures. Possibility of altering the micro structure of existing weld and HAZ by application of the second weld. To avoid welding residual stress coupled with hardened micro structure in offshore environment.Regarding standards please find a review of minimum distance between welds in attached image.
In a typical Piping layout where 1000s of small piping / various pipe pups are welded with main line as per the compact layout and chances of welds coming closer are high.Various exemptions are provided by standards for near welds in case of branched connections like nozzles, tees etc without giving any technical justification. Radiography of joint is given as a testing excuse for such configurations by some standards. Fatigue in small piping is main concern due to vibrations and failure due to fatigue in close welds can be more catastrophic. In case of Repair procedure of replacing small pipe lengths there are high chances where welds in close proximity can arise without being able to maintain the minimum distance. No established WPS, PQR established for near welds configurations are established in case of repair where new welds comes closer to a existing weld which has been prone to fatigue, corrosion in his service life and hence a new weld close to a old one induces more residual stresses and susceptible micro structure between them.
Questions-1. How often does welds in close proximity is a non compliance to standards encountered in piping structures.
2. Can some of the members share any practical experiences with real time examples and pictures.
3. What is the practise adopted by all concerned at site to resolve this issue.
4. Any know failures occurred due to such configurations of welds.
5. During inspections how does asset management inspectors/ engineers perceive this problem.
6. Any other suggestions useful to conduct this study.
Capture_pdtujv.png

Thank you all in advance.
@thread378-215240, thread378-370184, thread292-257330, thread725-342321, thread378-242240
Regards
Sachin
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sachin,
Where is this noted in ASME IX 2013 ?
Regards,
Shane
 
Where in B31.3-2016 is the requirement listed for 5t or 30° on long. welds? The closest I could find is para 328.4.3(a), but that para doesnt specify such requirements.
 
It's a bit of a pity that you posted this in what is a bit of a backwater of a forum.

I posted a link in the pipeline forum, but you may want to post a link to this in the welding forum also as I think it is a very interesting area which has not really received any detail testing or technical investigation.

Your q's
Questions-1. How often does welds in close proximity is a non compliance to standards encountered in piping structures.
Well circumferential to circumferential should be resolved by design, but where it appears in piping then you either generate a longer length somewhere, but it is fairly rare.

2. Can some of the members share any practical experiences with real time examples and pictures.
Not really a site man but there are many if you search this forum

3. What is the practise adopted by all concerned at site to resolve this issue.
either cut it out and re-do with a longer pup piece or suck teeth for a while and then accept it.

4. Any know failures occurred due to such configurations of welds.
None I'm aware of.

5. During inspections how does asset management inspectors/ engineers perceive this problem.


6. Any other suggestions useful to conduct this study.
Some proper tensile tests between the min distance and basically as close as you can get would be very illuminating



Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
Sachin
As per which clause of sec VIII Div 1, if impact testing is required , minimum distance can not be exempted?

Can u mention the clause?
 
LI,
A backwater forum ?
The majority of issues with circ welds being in close proximity to each other happens in Process Piping (ASME B31.3) or Power Piping (ASME B31.1) - not on pipelines !
I agree 100% that it is an interesting subject that needs more discussion,
Cheers,
Shane
 
I can speak to #5.

I have seen tanks, piping and pressure vessel examples of welds in close proximity to one another. This is for both longitudinal and circumferencial (girth) weld seams.

Effects of these vary based upon many variables. The main negative effect I have seen is where the heat inputs were high enough to either effect the metallurgy of the nearby weld or had created distortion in dimensions.

These instances have been both in service and new construction examples.

Eric
API 510 & 653
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor