Itsnotgoinganywhere
Petroleum
- May 22, 2015
- 13
Good afternoon folks. I'm working to expand some existing WPS ranges and want to make sure I don't have to run a million PQRs because we are using GMAW-S for the root passes.
I have an existing PQR on 3/8” plate with GMAW-S root and FCAW fill, with impacts, which qualifies a WPS for 3/8”-.4125” base metal (QW403.10 limit on short arc T range). A second CVN-only test plate of ¼” is welded with all other variables the same, that extends the qualified procedure to 3/16”-.412” base metal, correct? I think that QW401.1 will allow this and I do not have to worry about the gap between .275” (.25 x 1.1) and .375”, or does the GMAW-S spoil this again and limit the procedure with an odd middle gap like so: 3/16"-.275" and .375"-.4125"?
If I were to run a full PQR test with tensile and bends, I could then further expand a WPS for 0.125" - 0.412" if needed.
Insight and your interpretations appreciated.
I have an existing PQR on 3/8” plate with GMAW-S root and FCAW fill, with impacts, which qualifies a WPS for 3/8”-.4125” base metal (QW403.10 limit on short arc T range). A second CVN-only test plate of ¼” is welded with all other variables the same, that extends the qualified procedure to 3/16”-.412” base metal, correct? I think that QW401.1 will allow this and I do not have to worry about the gap between .275” (.25 x 1.1) and .375”, or does the GMAW-S spoil this again and limit the procedure with an odd middle gap like so: 3/16"-.275" and .375"-.4125"?
If I were to run a full PQR test with tensile and bends, I could then further expand a WPS for 0.125" - 0.412" if needed.
Insight and your interpretations appreciated.