Tunalover
Mechanical
- Mar 28, 2002
- 1,179
Folks-
This might stir the pot, but here goes. I use the "fit formulas" for robust design.
For fixed fastener cases:
H=F+T1+T2 where H=clearance hole diameter @MMC, F=fastener major diameter @MMC, T1=positional tolerance of, say, clearance hole @MMC and T2=positional tolerance of threaded hole (or captive stud) pitch diameter @MMC.
For floating fastener cases, my references give:
H=F+T where H=clearance hole diameter @MMC, F=fastener major diameter @MMC and T=positional tolerance of both holes @MMC.
The above is just fine and dandy IF BOTH HOLES ARE OF THE SAME DIAMETER AND POSITIONAL TOLERANCE. But often this can't be!
What about the most general FLOATING fastener case where the holes in both parts may have different diameters and positional tolerances? Is it true that:
H1+H2=2F+T1+T2? If so, under what conditions is this true? Why don't the textbooks address this more general (and practical) scenario? If this formula is true, why don't the books publish it?
TIA
Tunalover
This might stir the pot, but here goes. I use the "fit formulas" for robust design.
For fixed fastener cases:
H=F+T1+T2 where H=clearance hole diameter @MMC, F=fastener major diameter @MMC, T1=positional tolerance of, say, clearance hole @MMC and T2=positional tolerance of threaded hole (or captive stud) pitch diameter @MMC.
For floating fastener cases, my references give:
H=F+T where H=clearance hole diameter @MMC, F=fastener major diameter @MMC and T=positional tolerance of both holes @MMC.
The above is just fine and dandy IF BOTH HOLES ARE OF THE SAME DIAMETER AND POSITIONAL TOLERANCE. But often this can't be!
What about the most general FLOATING fastener case where the holes in both parts may have different diameters and positional tolerances? Is it true that:
H1+H2=2F+T1+T2? If so, under what conditions is this true? Why don't the textbooks address this more general (and practical) scenario? If this formula is true, why don't the books publish it?
TIA
Tunalover