Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

fixed and pinned supports

Status
Not open for further replies.

abdallah hamdan

Structural
Oct 13, 2021
32
if I have a beam with pin supports (columns) as in fig (1)
1_s8in4c.png


Is having a weight P due to the existence of upper floors on the beam sides as in fig 2, lead the beam to act as there is fixed support on both ends?
2_mgssog.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I might add that the same confusion arises with the term "pinned". A beam may be pinned to a column. That does not mean that the beam has a pinned support, because the joint may translate when the column bends. A pinned support permits free rotation, but prevents translation.

BA
 

Concur... but with a slab to a stair or elevator core, the relative stiffness of the slab to the core, nearly makes them fixed.

Rather than think climate change and the corona virus as science, think of it as the wrath of God. Feel any better?

-Dik
 
Wl/8 midspan, Wl/16 at supports. That should do it, unless the support is truly fixed, which is rare.

Depending on the conditions the concrete is poured (monolithic or otherwise) with end conditions the negative bending an be greater than WL/16 for concrete beams.
diagram_uorr5v.png


CDH 4th Edition
 
BAretired said:
I think some clarification is needed. The OP is referring to Fig. 7.14A of SP34, "Handbook on Concrete Reinforcing and Detailing" in which the term "FIXED" is used.

A beam may be fixed to a column, meaning that the beam and column are rigidly connected, hence have equal rotation. That does not mean the beam has a fixed support, because, as hokie66 pointed out, the joint will rotate when load is applied to the beam. The amount of rotation depends on the stiffness of all members meeting at the joint.

BAretired said:
I might add that the same confusion arises with the term "pinned". A beam may be pinned to a column. That does not mean that the beam has a pinned support, because the joint may translate when the column bends. A pinned support permits free rotation, but prevents translation.

Agreed. This difference seems to have ended up with different answers in both this thread and the "moment / fixed connection" thread also discussed in the last couple of days.

Part of the difference comes down to peoples work flow. If your design approach does not incorporate full frame analysis then assuming joints as fixed can lead to unconservative outcomes even if the connection itself is effectively fixed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor