HB2U
Civil/Environmental
- Feb 21, 2003
- 33
Hi all, hope someone here can shed a bit of light on this for me....
Here's the background. A neighboring property was recently sold and the new owner had his lot surveyed. With his lot came a 24ft by 37ft piece of property that had been carved out of my property around 1915.
My property description dates back to about 1800 and all calls and distances remained the same during that entire period according to the deed research that I've done.
The new neighbor called and told me that since that parcel is floating, i.e. it does not call out any substantive landmarks in it's description, it can be placed anywhere along the shared property boundary. I disagree because the metes and bounds description gives a bearing and distance along the edge of a road as one of the calls. The remaining calls in the description are taken at 90 degrees to one another so that the property forms a perfect rectangle.
This parcel is currently situated (at least the zig-zag in my fence puts it here) at a 3 street intersection on the inside of a curve in the roadway. I know that the road was realigned years ago when they removed the old wooden bridge, but I'm not sure whether it encroached on his little piece of property or not.
Anyway, assuming that the road didn't engulf his little piece, I think that in order to correctly locate that parcel all that would have to be done is to locate the tangent on this curve of the road that matches the bearing of the original deed that is given to be parallel to the road edge. Is that right?
I currently have a request in to the PADOT archives department to see if I can find an old plan of the area.
Does anyone have any suggestions? I want to give the guy what is rightfully his, but he's coming across in a really threatening manner so I wanted to know if there's any set way that this type of parcel should be pinned down. That way I'll know what to do next.
Thanks.
Here's the background. A neighboring property was recently sold and the new owner had his lot surveyed. With his lot came a 24ft by 37ft piece of property that had been carved out of my property around 1915.
My property description dates back to about 1800 and all calls and distances remained the same during that entire period according to the deed research that I've done.
The new neighbor called and told me that since that parcel is floating, i.e. it does not call out any substantive landmarks in it's description, it can be placed anywhere along the shared property boundary. I disagree because the metes and bounds description gives a bearing and distance along the edge of a road as one of the calls. The remaining calls in the description are taken at 90 degrees to one another so that the property forms a perfect rectangle.
This parcel is currently situated (at least the zig-zag in my fence puts it here) at a 3 street intersection on the inside of a curve in the roadway. I know that the road was realigned years ago when they removed the old wooden bridge, but I'm not sure whether it encroached on his little piece of property or not.
Anyway, assuming that the road didn't engulf his little piece, I think that in order to correctly locate that parcel all that would have to be done is to locate the tangent on this curve of the road that matches the bearing of the original deed that is given to be parallel to the road edge. Is that right?
I currently have a request in to the PADOT archives department to see if I can find an old plan of the area.
Does anyone have any suggestions? I want to give the guy what is rightfully his, but he's coming across in a really threatening manner so I wanted to know if there's any set way that this type of parcel should be pinned down. That way I'll know what to do next.
Thanks.