ginsoakedboy
Mechanical
- Oct 14, 2004
- 157
My work involves heat transfer analysis of subsea oil production and processing equipment. Often, we have to simulate the heat transfer behavior of subsea wellheads and trees to design insulation geometry among other things.
There are 2 schools of thought in the company:
1. One group of people firmly believe that the wellbore is a great source of heat (via natural convection) even when the flow is stopped (shut-in or shutdown).
2. The second group of people believes that the equipment above the mudline and the bore fluid will cool at a rate faster than the wellbore can replenish. And, natural convection will not be sufficient to maintain the fluids within subsea equipment above a certain temperature.
How can I settle this debate? I think the key concept involves natural convection within a long, vertical tube.
Can you please help?
zdas04, does this look better?
There are 2 schools of thought in the company:
1. One group of people firmly believe that the wellbore is a great source of heat (via natural convection) even when the flow is stopped (shut-in or shutdown).
2. The second group of people believes that the equipment above the mudline and the bore fluid will cool at a rate faster than the wellbore can replenish. And, natural convection will not be sufficient to maintain the fluids within subsea equipment above a certain temperature.
How can I settle this debate? I think the key concept involves natural convection within a long, vertical tube.
Can you please help?
zdas04, does this look better?